trial day 37: the defense continues its case in chief #109

Status
Not open for further replies.
Australia is so amazing. The people there that I met were amazing and lovely. It was a wonderful trip for ..i was there for 2 months. Tasmania was wonderful as well. If you ever get a chance..go to both.

Yes, but difficult to communicate.

I mean, who speaks Australian?

:crazy:
 
Maybe she didn't needed to have a private practice for years? Her dh is an engineer from Berkley and her son has a law practice on Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills.

I wonder how she would feel about jodi if it was her son who was slaughtered! I bet then she would not use her BS in court!Don't these kinds of woman ever think about their own sons,or male loved ones as they sprout this nonsense! Not all woman who claim abuse have been abused,especially when there is nothing proving it! and when they have murdered a man.It has become a great defense and I find that sickening. I still can not believe they fell for it with Mary Winkler who murdered her husband in cold blood and got away with a slap instead of a life sentence.
 
I think jurors have felt that ...ESP those close to her who rarely eve looked at her all,those days on the stand.

This is interesting to me that so many that knew her say they have felt this.
I have felt evil on people. Not often, but I have felt it. I have literally felt sick to my stomach. Oddly enough, or I should say scary enough, one of these I am mentioning looked right thru me, but with intensity. I knew he knew I knew. Creepy!!!! If I were her atty I don't know if I could sit by her if I felt what others have said.
Next, I wonder why Travis didn't sense it immediately.
Btw, I do not mean any of this from any religious aspect.
 
I heard Beth K just say there were no questions put in the jar by the jurors today. To tell you the truth, I think they're confused about whether she thinks ja was the victim or the abuser. I know I am:facepalm:

I think they've learned that questions in basket = a whole extra day in court..so will keep them for the really big stuff now :)
 
Lol, kinda my point. Bless his heart.

Do you know TX STILL has no helmet laws? :what:

Sorry for the OT.

You're kidding? Really?

I think in this day and age if an adult doesn't wear a seat belt or a helmet ...it should invalidate their insurance....they're on their own. Good luck with that!
 
I saw that too...I'm surprised!

Then where did JM get his question about jodi telling ALV the *advertiser censored* was on TA's computer???? I thought she DID interview her.

Holy smoke, if this is one long hypothetical, what did they do? Decide to go this route and toss out anything she got from interviews?
 
Good grief! What was the defense thinking in having this person on the stand blathering on and on about nothing that has anything to do with the case and for an entire DAY! Boring the ever-loving heck out of the jury and everyone else in the courtroom with irrelevant blather is one reallllly stupid strategy.

I didn't get it, either. But, then again, I think one person is asserting power and control at that defense table. And she doesn't have a law degree. :twocents:
 
Do we know what the defense motion is?

ETA: TIA!!!!

Defense Team filed a motion for protective order against Beth Karas, and two
other media staff to prevent them obtaining financial records IIRC- she wants to know the DT costs so far. Not sure if this is all she is seeking but that's all I've seen stated...
 
You can understand a guy sticking around for a beautiful girl, even for 6 months. But JA is really not that good looking. Or am I just not seeing what others see there? I'm oblivious.


I do not see it either! Even blond she was ugly to me!
 
Next up: The "stunning revelation" that Jack the Ripper had a problem with women.[/QUOTE]


Tune in to HLN After Dark for this breaking news story! NG and JVM are on the story....unleash the lawyers!:floorlaugh:
 
Today I learned:

1. ALV's description of an abuser just described Jodi to a Tee.
2. If you come from an unstable upbringing, you will be an "abuser" later on in life. *sarcasm*
 
OMG. JC on NG saying "ALV doesn't cast blame on anyone ... just there to explain ...

What a joke .... JC's head is somewhere in a "very dark hole" right now !!

don't buy it, myself. There are too many subliminal dt talking points here imo. She has worked with the dt for years and knows exactly what they are going to ask her and why. The answers she give are loaded, and filled with innuendo imo
 
This is interesting to me that so many that knew her say they have felt this.
I have felt evil on people. Not often, but I have felt it. I have literally felt sick to my stomach. Oddly enough, or I should say scary enough, one of these I am mentioning looked right thru me, but with intensity. I knew he knew I knew. Creepy!!!! If I were her atty I don't know if I could sit by her if I felt what others have said.
Next, I wonder why Travis didn't sense it immediately.
Btw, I do not mean any of this from any religious aspect.

Travis IMO maturity wise appears to be approx 15 years old.
 
Just a thought on Travis' nice house vs. her grandparents' more modest home;

I don't know if her grandparents owned their home outright or were still holding a mortgage, as "crappy" as it is according to some, but Travis had two mortgages on his house and according to his texts to JA where he says he is trying to save his house, he wasn't able to make those payments easily.....I think I would rather own a home that I can afford even if some people make fun of it as opposed to a really nice home and a closet full of custom made clothes with a lien on it.

Jodi's grandparents are not on trial and their home is a perfectly nice one. :(. They bought what they could afford. How is that shameful?
Amen to that! I find myself dismissing whole post that make fun of her GP home or run along the lines of suggesting she was "white trash" because of her GP's have a modest house. I mean wth, are people not aware that MOST people who live in this country ( and *gasp* the whole world) are not wealthy? Does that make them trash? I know people hate her, heck I hate her, but I just don't get that angle.

She sickens me because she murdered a man, not because she was/is poor. MOO
 
:waitasec: She HAD two licenses that were both cancelled years ago, so she isn't even a licensed psychologist in the State of California.

Search Results for Psychologist (incl. Reg. Psych. and Psychological Asst.)
This information is updated Monday through Friday - Last updated: MAR-25-2013
To see available information for a licensee/registrant, click on the highlighted name.
This will also include enforcement actions if any are present.

LAVIOLETTE ALYCE PSB 16213 Cancelled
LAVIOLETTE ALYCE D PSB 10905 Cancelled

http://www2.dca.ca.gov/pls/wllpub/WLLQRYNA$LCEV2.ActionQuery

License Number: PSB16213
License Status: CANCELLED Definition
Expiration Date: January 31, 1992
Issue Date: July 06, 1989

License Number: PSB10905
License Status: CANCELLED Definition
Expiration Date: January 31, 1989
Issue Date: July 01, 1985

Both her licenses show she was licensed as a Psychological Assistant, authorized to work only under the supervision of Psychologist Charles Thomas Stockton.

The license of Charles Thomas Stockton was revoked effective 7/30/97 due to his having sex with a patient he was treating for depression, then tried to bribe a minister to dissuade her from suing him. Here's the article that appeared in the Los Angeles Times about the revocation of his license: http://articles.latimes.com/1997-03-27/local/me-42770_1_long-beach-therapist

That put her out of a job.

http://www2.dca.ca.gov/pls/wllpub/WLLQRYNA$LCEV2.QueryView?P_LICENSE_NUMBER=16213&P_LTE_ID=724
http://www2.dca.ca.gov/pls/wllpub/WLLQRYNA$LCEV2.QueryView?P_LICENSE_NUMBER=6141&P_LTE_ID=725
http://www2.dca.ca.gov/pls/wllpub/WLLQRYNA$LCEV2.QueryView?P_LICENSE_NUMBER=6141&P_LTE_ID=725

btw even though Dr. Samuels insisted psychologists are trained not to get emotionally involved with patients, that is not strictly true. Our psychologist friend who was easily taken advantage of by others was also sued by a patient, not because they'd had sex but because he stopped having sex with her. ;)
 
Today I learned:

1. ALV's description of an abuser just described Jodi to a Tee.
2. If you come from an unstable upbringing, you will be an "abuser" later on in life. *sarcasm*


Goodness gracious! I guess I'm an abuser then....or will be. Later in life. Thanks for the warning!
 
Those may not be actually cancellation of her license, but cancellation of that specific license number. ? Perhaps every three years the State of Ca. gives the applicants a new number when they renew their license. ?

I read her CV last week and she obtained her master's degree sometime in the 80s. Maybe this affected her license number/registration.

In PA, the license number is kept forever if you pay your fees, complete your CMEs, aren't convicted of a felony, and don't become a substance abuser.

Maybe she just didn't get her payment for the license renewal in in time or complete her continued educations courses in time. I think a lot of licensed professionals tend to put the license renewal stuff on the back burner until the eleventh hour.
 
don't buy it, myself. There are too many subliminal dt talking points here imo. She has worked with the dt for years and knows exactly what they are going to ask her and why. The answers she give are loaded, and filled with innuendo imo

Bingo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Keep Websleuths Free

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
567
Total visitors
689

Forum statistics

Threads
617,099
Messages
18,361,687
Members
237,427
Latest member
meowcats7
Back
Top