That's how it should be. However, some of the more pointless questioning often appears to me to be fighting just to fight. I honestly can't believe we even spent time on the copyright questioning. Showing it to Juan to discuss the meaning of the test would NOT be a copyright violation. To act as if it were, while placing it on the overheard, struck me as fighting just to fight. But, who knows, maybe I missed the higher purpose in that questioning?
Maybe JA is playing at looking disturbed now, since this credible witness has diagnosed her as mentally ill.
I wondered last night if that diagnosis might ironically save her life. She's fit to stand trial and isn't pleading insanity, but a juror who would rather go with LWOP than the DP might be able to hang their hat on a solid diagnosis.
Did it just come out that Samuels scored her with a personality disorder NOS?
How positively offensive. "let's see if we can get through this"
like Dr D is the problem???????????
jeeze JW, you are horrible, truly horrible as a trial lawyer.
And FFS quit asking the witness where the hell you are in your questioning.