I wonder if this is the main reason for the defence having Reeva at the right side of the bed . When the scene looks more like she would have been on the left both iPads were found at the right hand side of the bed and DT were keen to have on record there is no proof who was using them at the time .
I can't help but there is more that Mel was hoping to bring out in cross exam of OP failing that closing arguments ?
Bearing in mind Reeva had stayed the night before she would have likely known where to place her slippers the second night .
Obviously that is assuming that Reeva ever got into bed that night . I can't buy into her wearing those clothes all day ,then doing a yoga session and leaving them on to go to bed to sleep or otherwise .
If it is all about the iPad use or content then my guess is it should be something more than a bit of *advertiser censored* . I am not into that but lots are so what could it be ?
Hopefully it won't be an anti climax .
Honestly, I think that's all it is. The state wants to say that Oscar was looking at *advertiser censored* which a. Means Oscar is a bad guy who watches *advertiser censored* with his girlfriend in the house and b. could have led to a fatal argument. So Roux, naturally, has to argue this point. I think people are wanting and hoping it to be more because of how thin the overall case against Oscar was and hoping Nel has something up his sleeve. But I just can't imagine he'd have something incriminating against Oscar and then leave it up in the air and in the lap of the judge. I mean, he has to give Roux a chance to dispute it, right? It's the *advertiser censored* history, I'm sure of it now.