minor4th
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 8,152
- Reaction score
- 2,110
So it's over already for today? Mediate just shows videos for yesterday(Day17). Thank you.
http://www.wildabouttrial.com/one_off/oscar-pistorius-trial-archive/
So it's over already for today? Mediate just shows videos for yesterday(Day17). Thank you.
So it's over already for today? Mediate just shows videos for yesterday(Day17). Thank you.
Originally Posted by 04009margaret
I think his whole story is a lie & he has now convinced himself that it's true, including emotions that go with that story. He only becomes distraught when he has to confront what he has done to Reeva & when he thinks of the consequences for himself.
xxxxxxxxxxx
OP is distraught because he said he doesn't know what the implications of his answers would be.
And before the police arrived when OP and Ms. Stander went upstairs. Wonder what all was moved around then? And how exactly can the defense prove that the police contaminated the crime scene but yet the numerous people in the home that were there for OP (Stander, Ms. Stander, sister, etc) didn't contaminate the crime scene themselves.
MOO
Really hard to say because I have never represented a criminal defendant. It's my understanding though that Roux is not even allowed to consult with him until after he is finished with his testimony.
The way I go about things with my clients is basically - let's just get the truth out there and don't be afraid to admit an error if you've made one; be willing to accept the consequences of your own actions and hold others responsible for theirs. I've had clients who were pretty much on the wrong side of things- they had done something stupid or wrong that is going to look bad. I always try to deal with those things up front and have them acknowledge those things and show that they have learned from it.
Kind of vague, I know - but I'm just thinking if I was preparing Oscar for his testimony, I would caution him against being defensive and argumentative, to concede reasonable points and to just be honest. Very important also is for Oscar to ask for clarification if he doesn't understand the question - there were times today when it seemed like he was answering what he thought Nel was asking or even using different terminology when he would have been better off asking for clarification of the question.
I do not use guns but I imagine one has to apply a reasonable amount of pressure to the trigger to make it fire, ie intentionally apply pressure. As Roux would say is that so, or not so? Perhaps someone would like to venture an opinion. Does OP's gun have a safety catch on it too? Is that something that has to be released with each bullet or only at the start of several shots?
Yep and I have found the ignore feature to be a useful tool. I would encourage its liberal use by those who have difficulty with particular posters. (I was not at all suggesting that you had said or done anything offensive)
I agree that there's a difference - Mrs. Stipp was clearly lying (or she was tricked by the police into signing a statement that they fudged) and Oscar's was an in-artful use of words that has now been clarified - no reason for him to contradict himself and give a different version now. It's not like he totally made up seeing a person that he didn't see.
his first call didn't prove to be to the emergency services though. it was to a friend who could help him. so a locked phone was no use to him.
Not really. He hemmed and hawed about it but eventually said that yes he pulled the trigger and the gun didn't go off by accident - but that he shot without having time for reflection or forming a deliberate intent to kill an intruder.
He said he had 'many thoughts'. So he had time to have 'many thoughts' but no time for reflection. Hmmm.Not really. He hemmed and hawed about it but eventually said that yes he pulled the trigger and the gun didn't go off by accident - but that he shot without having time for reflection or forming a deliberate intent to kill an intruder.
Yes, how can he say that he tried to use Reeva's phone to call NetCare, and yet once he has his own phone to hand, NetCare is not the first person he calls and he phones Stander instead? :facepalm:
01:48:48 GPRS 309 seconds tower closest to Oscars (the remaining are all on the same tower as well)
03:18:45 GPRS 75 seconds
03:19:03 Outgoing call to 2251 (Johan Stander) 24 seconds
03:20:02 GPRS 79 seconds
03:20:05 Outgoing call to 082911 (ambulance service) 66 seconds
03:21:22 GPRS 61 seconds
03:21:33 Outgoing call to 6797 (Baba, security) 9 seconds
03:21:47 Outgoing call to 121 (voicemail) 7 seconds
03:22:05 Incoming call from 6797 (Baba, security)
03:55:02 Outgoing call to 8888 (Justin Devaris) 123 seconds
I still can't make out how much of a discussion could have been had with the emergency services that only lasted 66 seconds, either.
What good does it do to kick a door that swings open towards the outside instead of opening towards the inside? The door is not going to swing open after kicking it so why? Unless of course it was out of anger and/or to scare the person in the toilet room.
MOO
He said he had 'many thoughts'. So he had time to have 'many thoughts' but no time for reflection. Hmmm.
That is so m'lady. Gun will keep on firing once safety is off.
:smile:
ETA: you need to squeeze trigger each time tho.
In summation, Oscar's "firing by accident" questioning was a shambles.
An appropriate phrase for his firing actions which I would use, would be : auto pilot regarding intruder terror.
But in the very same statement, he catalogued the things he had time to think about. Literally. Deliberate intent doesn't matter nearly as much as disproving any intent.
This is where I'd think, as an attorney, the 'less is more' credo in testifying would come into play.
Please pardon errors as posted via Tapatalk with a less than stellar user.
Yes, I think he was having trouble verbalizing it and Nel was being pedantic.