Once the trigger is pressed,
the pistol will fire after which the recoil operation automatically extracts, ejects
and reloads the chamber until all rounds are fired.
1
Thus the appellant could
not have paused in between the shots to deliberately and intentionally shoot
the deceased.
Hmm see this to me indicates an automatic weapon as the appellant could not have paused between shots, if the bullets were just rapidly chambered he could have stopped.
It was enough for a judge to overturn a ruling I can't imagine that a rapidly clambering gun would be enough to overrule a judgement.
I'm not sure who brought the case here but they will know more than me.