Greater Than
Retired Moderator
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2014
- Messages
- 3,948
- Reaction score
- 75
Unless it's among his legal restrictions, he can speak to whomever he pleases unless what he says amounts to a crime. The prosecutor's office has already said they're not doing anything about it, so I guess it's not among his restrictions or a crime.
I don't know why he would have said those specific words to her. I only know that they aren't a threat and, to me, suggest innocence rather than guilt. Now if he'd said something like "better watch your back" or anything remotely similar, I'd understand the todo.
jmo
Regardless of any (or lack of) legal restrictions, it was class A STUPID to utter such accusatory and inappropriate words to one of the victim's best friends. It's high time he utilizes some self control and anger management techniques. He is on trial for murder, with a social worker testifying today how heartbroken he is for Reeva's family, and he has the audacity to say something like that?! We can't outlaw stupid, but we can certainly pass judgment based on it. MOO