bessie
Verified Insider
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 31,771
- Reaction score
- 1,690
<rsbm>This is as close as I could find.
Edit: ...and this.
Source for the images, please.
<rsbm>This is as close as I could find.
Edit: ...and this.
Apologies for interrupting. I am just beginning to watch the start of Monday's session on YouTube. If I were to post here it would be about trial events most of you have already witnessed. Would I be breaking up the flow of conversation and be unwelcome with those posts? Either way I will understand. Please let me know in advance.:blushing: Thanks.
N: If the ccused can see-if there's light, the risk of falling is less?
Dr agrees, Nel repeats question about why Dr mentioned OP being vulnerable without a weapon.
Dr: He is still impaired (with weapon) but not as impaired as he would be without one.
:seeya: Geev & Chell, I can't watch today but maybe can jump in tomorrow!
Having one of those lovely Mondays :facepalm:
Catch up soon... :loveyou:
I'm only going from memory, and it's too late to look for it, but I thought the fan cable went behind a speaker on the left-hand side of the DVD player and the photo showing this didn't reveal how long the cord was. I thought Nel implied it was too short to reach the extension cord AND in any event it couldn't have been plugged in because the big fan and hair clippers were plugged in and there wasn't a spare socket for the small fan to be plugged in.
Sorry, you are respectfully incorrect. ➊The "cops" controlled the crime scene therefore were responsible for every item there during that time. ➋The "cops" didn't take the cable into evidence, therefore they are responsible for that too.
And to be fair the "cops" probably didn't need it but much later, without checking they had the cable, Nel decides to use the cable, or a photo of it, to prove a part of the State's case, i.e. that OP's testimony of what happened when he returned to the bedroom couldn't possibly be true.
Now, if I have this correct, for the relative part of the State's evidence to stand in evidence, Nel would have to enter the cable into evidence and file it with the court, along with the measurement of the distance from fan to plug which from a photo of the cable Nel affirmed could not reach where OP said it had been plugged in. otherwise IMO it will have to be struck off the record which is what I believe Roux is going for, not the cable itself which he knows is never gonna appear now.
<rsbm>
Source for the images, please.
For today's early testimony, it is unlikely that OP was moving around on his stumps prior to and during the murder.
~rsbm~
For the life of me I can't figure out why OP is crying out to the night for help when his longtime domestic helper, Frank, is asleep downstairs in a room said to be right off the kitchen. Why has Nel never asked OP, "Why did you not call out to Frank or ask him to help you move Reeva downstairs instead of calling the Standers?"
What does rsbm stand for?
Anyone have a link to the continuous replay of live coverage of trial today?
Thank you!!:cheers: