The thing I found strange - how could a psych state for certain there were no issues in previous relationships unless they spoke to the other people involved?
I am afraid that I fully agree with you. lol
It will be harder to argue that he snapped in a rage and killed her purposely now.
He's sincerely grieving and emotional for himself.That report was helpful for the defense. Roux and OP never claimed diminished capacity or mental defect that would render him unable to understand what he was doing or appreciate right from wrong.
Dr MV called it GAD, but the report calls it vulnerability, especially when on his stumps. That was the whole point of the doctor's testimony - to explain that Oscar felt threatened and vulnerable to harm because of past incidents and his disability.
In addition, you've now got a report from psychiatrists and psychologists who evaluated him for 30 days and find that he does not have a rage or anger problem and that his emotions and grieving behaviors are sincere.
Are you eliminating the neighbours that heard arguing?
Who really uses the word "aforementioned" when speaking?
I am afraid that I fully agree with you. lol
It will be harder to argue that he snapped in a rage and killed her purposely now.
.. and yet there have been plenty of other examples where he has done just that (snapped in a rage) .. all proven.