ApplesInMyBra
Nobody
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2014
- Messages
- 266
- Reaction score
- 92
I can't believe she thinks the calibre of the black talon bullets is irrelevant!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nice to see you back. You will see a number of us agree with your WTF! Am I right in thinking you are a legal eagle. Apologies if I am remembering wrongly.
I knew this would happen - people questioning Masipa's competence just because they didn't get the verdict they wanted/expected. Sign:facepalm:
OP is not guilty of murder, but judge has just said he is negligent. So therefore cld be culpable homicide (like manslaughter), I think. And she has adjourned, for some unknown reason. Tea, probably. But that's it for today.
Again, if the law is so open for interpretation that so many legal experts to interpret the same law in different ways, then it need to be made clearer.
There WASN'T an intruder, though. "What if there was?" is totally irrelevant....there was not.
The law is clear....you have to have no other option available to you in order to justify shooting someone.
Even you can surely not suggest he had no other option.
Its not her fault that Uncle Arnold didnt finish typing them up until this morning.
~rsbm~
Nope, her competence has been questionned on a number of previous occasions throughout this trial by various people on here, because she asked a number of questions which proved to myself and others that she was not 'on the ball' and which had already made us doubt that she would arrive at the correct verdict. There have been many times where various people, including myself, have said they had lost faith in her because of the way she didn't seem to understand certain parts of the testimonies.
You really need to go back and read all the threads if you wish to keep commenting on this, to see that you are incorrect in what you say.
Rubbish. Plenty of posters questioned her competence and referred to her sympathy towards OP when he was on the stand.
You need to go back and read the threads PLEASE...
agree again. and what we now have is a loophole in wording of a law [just two words in this case] casting doubt over whether the outcome is a just one.
i do not find that at all comforting. just asking politely, how do you feel about it?
might be the exclamation mark bottom left? just guessing, I've been away so long I've just this second discovered the wonderful new look!
Hey, come on. That's unfair. You've Snipped the original post so that it's totally out of context. The poster was actually making a valid point.Thanks for reminding us, we would never have known
I can't believe she thinks the calibre of the black talon bullets is irrelevant!
People see what they want to see. No doubt if OP had been found guilty you would have still questioned her competence. :laughing: