Here is the problem with FBS in this case imo. Ross not only had cues to remind him but he was also talking/texting about Cooper. jmo
It's crazy to me that Ross watching a YouTube video was enough to be considered research, but a man with a PhD in Neurobiology and decades of experience studying the brain just has "an idea".
Gravity is a scientific theory too. A theory in science is much more than just an idea. Just because Dr. Diamond's research is considered theory is not a reason to discount it.
I just wonder if the other 40 or so parents whose kids die in their car each year (I'm assuming 40 is just the fatalities) had absolutely NO cue to remind them of their child. No pictures, thoughts, conversations, etc?
Thousands of scientists across generators have studied gravity. Thousands upon thousands of studies.
This guy has...himself. Degrees and education does not make this guys theory anything but his personal theory. I discount it, because he has marked himself the expert, and gone to no efforts to prove his theory reliably. IMO, he relies and banks on having cornered the market. Wouldn't be the first time a scientist did that.
Ross does not fit his theory, yet he's still gong to testify and will likely get paid thousands. That's suspect.
So I assume the state is bringing in a neuroscientist expert to counter Dr. D's research?
I would hope so.
Or, they could heavily question him on rebuttal, and the jury could use their common sense.
Hopefully he/she is working for free and is uncharismatic, since that seems to be a reason that some want to discount Diamond's research.
Here is the problem with FBS in this case imo. Ross not only had cues to remind him but he was also talking/texting about Cooper. jmo