FreeSafety36
Another Brick in The Wall
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2013
- Messages
- 92
- Reaction score
- 7
Amy's skull wasn't bashed.
Amy wasn't strangled.
Amy wasn't killed at all.
No ransom note was written or found in Amy's home.
No cleanup or staging occurred to Amy.
I know, I know...her attacker was interrupted, no one knows what he was going to do if he hadn't been. But the point is, these things didn't happen, and it serves no purpose to speculate they could have, because we can make the stretch that anyone could have almost done anything they didn't do.
The RN for JBR was very personally written to John. The RN says nothing about JBR. The RN answers many questions if the reader simply reads what is there. The author of the RN was at no point interested in JBR for any reason. One needs only ask themselves one question; if IDI, why were both the RN and corpse left behind in the same house? Once the corpse is found, the RN is nothing but possibly damning evidence against the author. The RN is there simply in a weak attempt to explain the corpse. If IDI, the last thing the killer would want to do is explain the corpse, even in an obviously incorrect direction. An intruder who was so careful to leave no evidence of having been there would not have simply forgotten the RN had been left.
The RN being written inside the home, with materials from inside the home, in addition to the corpse being left inside the home after being killed inside the home...everything took place inside the home. When we have a project, we all do as much as we can do in a place where we're most comfortable, a place where we know where things are, a place where we don't have to rush or fear being caught. No intruder would feel comfortable inside the home, and once whatever purpose they'd came to achieve had been achieved, any intruder would have gotten out of the home as quickly as possible.
Sorry, but IDI requires far too many outlandish explanations or omissions to even be seriously considered; especially when the only evidence it has going for it is some unidentified dna that may or may not have anything to do with the crime.
Amy wasn't strangled.
Amy wasn't killed at all.
No ransom note was written or found in Amy's home.
No cleanup or staging occurred to Amy.
I know, I know...her attacker was interrupted, no one knows what he was going to do if he hadn't been. But the point is, these things didn't happen, and it serves no purpose to speculate they could have, because we can make the stretch that anyone could have almost done anything they didn't do.
The RN for JBR was very personally written to John. The RN says nothing about JBR. The RN answers many questions if the reader simply reads what is there. The author of the RN was at no point interested in JBR for any reason. One needs only ask themselves one question; if IDI, why were both the RN and corpse left behind in the same house? Once the corpse is found, the RN is nothing but possibly damning evidence against the author. The RN is there simply in a weak attempt to explain the corpse. If IDI, the last thing the killer would want to do is explain the corpse, even in an obviously incorrect direction. An intruder who was so careful to leave no evidence of having been there would not have simply forgotten the RN had been left.
The RN being written inside the home, with materials from inside the home, in addition to the corpse being left inside the home after being killed inside the home...everything took place inside the home. When we have a project, we all do as much as we can do in a place where we're most comfortable, a place where we know where things are, a place where we don't have to rush or fear being caught. No intruder would feel comfortable inside the home, and once whatever purpose they'd came to achieve had been achieved, any intruder would have gotten out of the home as quickly as possible.
Sorry, but IDI requires far too many outlandish explanations or omissions to even be seriously considered; especially when the only evidence it has going for it is some unidentified dna that may or may not have anything to do with the crime.
