ami
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 3,175
- Reaction score
- 5
I don't mean to muddy the waters further, but a bombshell report in the NY Post this morning claims that the FBI doubts the innocence of the trip.
It claims she met with "a criminal element" in Amsterdam/Istanbul.
It claims that drug trafficking is suspected, and very much still on the table.
It claims she and her husband had severe money problems (bankruptcy in the past, etc.).
It claims that her husband and brother have been "cooperative" with LE but not "helpful", i.e. that they are holding info back.
Almost none of us, including me, want to hear this at this point. But I believe in putting out ALL the information for consideration.
The NY Post is a shade more reputable than the sensationalizing Turkish press, but it also has been known to publish nonsense on occasion.
Here's the article: LINK
I feel like this is another example of sensationalistic journalism, trying to find another headline grabbing spin once the pictures of her face and coffin were common & widely distributed.
1. "The FBI ...is looking into a possible connection to drug trafficking among other lines of inquiry, a source said."
Of course they are. They would be irresponsible not to look into sexual, financial, drug related and romantic lines of inquiry, simply because they don't know why she was killed and they need to cast a wide net. They could as easily have said "The FBI is looking into a possible connection to Instagram - among other lines of inquiry" and been equally correct.
2. "...some witness reports that she was seen with sketchy characters,"
Okay what does that even mean? Her landlord was "sketchy", some of the men who were on IG were "sketchy"? Sketchy is a subjective, vague term. To me that's non-reporting.
3. "Sierras relatives ...are being cooperative, sources close to the probe said. But being cooperative and being helpful are two different things, said one source."
Again, there's not even a real statement there, just a sly innuendo. There's no statement that they are not forthcoming, just that "helpful and cooperative are words with different meanings" - so are "alien" and "fruitbowl".
4. They mention her "unemployment" (stay at home mom) and refer to a bankruptsy in 2005 - 8 years ago! By the time of her trip, Sarai and her husband both had jobs, she was going back to school, enrolled in college - clearly their situation has changed in the last 8 years and they are more comfortable. The article wanted to paint them as desperately poor (but she had an ipad, she was taking college classes - this was not a family one step from the streets!)
They also mention that she was traveling alone again - as if this is a sure sign of nefarious intentions. Sigh. I give this article a weight of 1 on a scale from 1-10.