I think this appeal is messed up for a couple of reasons.
First, I don't fault her attorneys for doing what they are trained to do under the laws in the state of Texas. It's also AG's right to file an appeal and have it heard in court but I really question her argument.
AG was initially charged with manslaughter after she fatally shot BJ when he was sitting in his own apartment eating ice-cream, but she was later indicted on murder.
A Manslaughter charge meant AG acted recklessly.
(Murder carries a sentence of up to life in prison. Manslaughter, which is a second-degree felony, carries a sentencing range of two to 20 years).
AG's appeal requests that the court acquit her of murder, and convict her of criminally negligent homicide, and remand the case for a new hearing for her punishment.
Overall, punishment in most states ranges from six months to
10 years for a negligent homicide conviction BUT in Texas, criminally negligent homicide is considered a
state jail felony - punishment between
180 days and two years in a state jail and to pay a fine of up to $10,000.
AG was a trained police officer.
She claimed her training caused her to act in self-defense.
That's not negligent homicide! That's simply arguing for a lesser sentence in the state of Texas.
No!
Date set for Amber Guyger's appeal of murder conviction in death of Botham Jean | wfaa.com