pjclover
New Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2010
- Messages
- 118
- Reaction score
- 23
I submitted Mary Louise Day over a month ago.
This was my reply from: MClark@ci.seaside
Hope this helps. To be honest the reply totally confused me. It was from MClark from Seaside, Ca where Mary Day's case is being investigated but if you read the answer it suddenly appears to be from a different person. I thought the UID was being investigated in Texas not Ca.
Wow, this confuses me as well. If I'm reading it correctly, it looks like the SSN that Longview Doe was using was that of a juvenile in Oregon? If that's the case, then how does that match up with the Ancestry record (which I have also reviewed...) of a SSN issued in TX in 1988? It can't be that we're wrong with the name of our Doe, but could it be that the TX issued SSN was for another TX resident of the same name? Texas is a big state...
And the partial SSN from New Jersey? I don't know how a *partial* SSN could factor in to things. I've never needed to use just six or seven numbers of my SSN to apply for anything, so this has me puzzled.
Thanks for the info regarding Mary Day, JeannieC! I'm not sure that Clark's reply rules her out in my mind, for several reasons. First of all, he may not recognize the picture of Mary as an adult - that doesn't mean it's not her. Secondly, 1959 isn't a definitive birthdate, as was mentioned. In fact, we don't know when Longview Doe was born, only an estimation. IMO (given the fact she gave birth for the first time around 2008) I would put her DOB around 1963 or later.