FleurQualia
Searching Soul
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2015
- Messages
- 546
- Reaction score
- 3,586
They have to prove she didn't die of an accident or natural causes. Granted, the amount of blood in the apartment should be able to rule out both.Can someone please explain to me why "intent", or "lack of intent", is why a murder charge has not been brought against DV, or anyone, for that matter?
A child that is abused to the point of death has been murdered. What else do you need to know? Am I wrong in thinking that there is no intent in this type of scenario? Intent to me almost seems to be pre meditation.
In Canada, proof of murder is enough to bring a murder charge. We don't need a theory or have to prove a theory or intent. So long as there is proof of murder then the rest falls into place.
Help me understand. Thanks all.
But they need to prove his actions led to her death beyond a reasonable doubt. Basically, they want to make sure they have a solid case, so he doesn't get acquitted.
Right now the only solid case they have against him is tampering with a corpse, pending the autopsy results.