HoustonGuy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2021
- Messages
- 50
- Reaction score
- 571
Interesting - I see your point. I'm not sure the bar analogy is quite analogous to this scenario but the close proximity description does seem to apply to this situation.Close proximity to a crime doesn't give police the right to search you. For example, the US Supreme Court held in Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979) that police couldn't search all the patrons at a bar where a crime was committed and held that a warrant can not be used to search an unnamed individual unless the warrant mentions that unnamed parties are involved or exigent circumstances are shown to exist.
I should also mention - the description above seems to apply to bodily/property searches, which is not the case in the scenario we're discussing, they were searching flight logs which intuition tells me is a bit more open ended given the national security implications and that she was labeled as "armed and dangerous".
MOO
Last edited: