bronzepurple
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2019
- Messages
- 278
- Reaction score
- 1,431
No, I don't think it was ever mentioned if his family were in court. We know his mother wasn't but that's it. I'd take it for granted his sister wasn't and since we've heard pretty much nothing from his father I'd probably assume he wasn't either but I might be wrong.
Maybe it was because had no family present in court and because he was technically a minor the judge was wondering if there would be anyone there for him? I'm just guessing though.
Not sure, never heard of it before though.
Yeah, I don't really know why they said that either. Or why they felt the need to mention that, but they didn't mention that they had, had an argument out on the street earlier that night (according to a witness). There are some very odd things in this case.
His father did attend court, I remember reading it in a media article online but I can't remember which one and I doubt I can find it now. Not sure how long he was there and if he stayed the whole week or not. His mother was there briefly to give some statements about AC.
I think the papers just mentioned the *advertiser censored* thing to make the story sound even worse, more of a juicy tidbit for the gossips.
Last edited: