RusselSprout
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2021
- Messages
- 735
- Reaction score
- 4,807
My guess is tomorrow or Friday at latest, but that may be wishful thinking.
Ms Prior says:
She says she didn't do anything to cause Arthur to die. That's her case. She is not a stupid woman. She knows all of the medical evidence is against her, again and again and again it has been pointed out to her. She is not an idiot.
She knows what it shows. Yet she says to you 'I didn't, I didn't'. Even if you reject that there's still decisions for you to make."
I'm not sure how to interpret this!!? Anyone?
Im getting angrier with each sentence I read.You have to stick to the rules. This is not a case of you sending out a message about child abuse'
Mr Richmond emphasises the importance of the jury removing emotion from their decision. He tells them:
You have to stick to the rules. This is not a case of you sending out a message about child abuse.
This is a case of you sending out a message that, no matter how horrible the facts, a British jury will behave fairly and come to the correct verdicts, even if they don't like it and others don't like it. That's what you signed up for."
Mr Richmond concedes the jury do not have a 'complete picture' and may have 'questions which remain unanswered'.
He warns against 'speculating' about what happened.
I assume Tustin's daughter?Who is Madeleine that Mr Richmond is referring to?
Thanks!Arthur Labinjo-Hughes 'knew his dad was going to kill him'
Adding this link as it has a court drawing of the two, they appear to be sitting next to one another?