UK UK - Claudia Lawrence, 35, Chef, York University, 18 March 2009 #18

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
View attachment 393844
You will either recognise-the-face OR NOT.
I know the context. I know the perspective.
The face belongs to one of the figures with CLAUDIA... as is the PRIME SUSPECT to be identified in my search for WHO WAS THERE at 21:01... 18/03/2009
SOURCE: BUS TV CCTV that I always link to.
I’m sorry I cannot make anything if it. If you were showing this to the team it has to be credible and understandable - I’m liking your effort and enthusiasm - however something like this has to be able to recognisably implicate a perp and for me it’s not there - apologies if it’s not what you want to hear - please keep trying !
 
I’m sorry I cannot make anything if it. If you were showing this to the team it has to be credible and understandable - I’m liking your effort and enthusiasm - however something like this has to be able to recognisably implicate a perp and for me it’s not there - apologies if it’s not what you want to hear - please keep trying !
i dont mind opinions. I am simply showing the unobfuscated facts. I'm not trying to frame anyone by ignoring the true pictures of the TRUE PERSON who was actually there. And that is what I show.

To put this in context... POLICE didnt even initially know the colour of the victim's hair (Claudia's hair) on the day she went missing. Too much is said by people who know nothing. I remain quiet if I dont know how to move forwards positively... rather than dismissively.

Throw some tidbots my way. Throw me some enhancements. None forthcoming.

I'm sure the Prime Suspect would surely love to control this thread... And as I close in on said psycho... who would lovingly 'whack' anyone who gets even close to revealing their true character. I would say to them...buy some real thick DIAPERS and expect a 'Knock Knock' real soon.
 
Last edited:
i dont mind opinions. I am simply showing the



acts. I'm not trying to frame anyone by ignoring the true pictures of the TRUE PERSON who was actually there. And that is what I show.

To put this in context... POLICE didnt even initially know the colour of the victim's hair (Claudia's hair) on the day she went missing. Too much is said by people who know nothing. I remain quiet if I dont know how to move forwards positively... rather than dismissively.

Throw some tidbots my way. Throw me some enhancements. None forthcoming.
i dont mind opinions. I am simply showing the unobfuscated facts. I'm not trying to frame anyone by ignoring the true pictures of the TRUE PERSON who was actually there. And that is what I show.

To put this in context... POLICE didnt even initially know the colour of the victim's hair (Claudia's hair) on the day she went missing. Too much is said by people who know nothing. I remain quiet if I dont know how to move forwards positively... rather than dismissively.

Throw some tidbots my way. Throw me some enhancements. None forthcoming.

I'm sure the Prime Suspect would surely love to control this thread... And as I close in on said psycho... who would lovingly 'whack' anyone who gets even close to revealing their true character. I would say to them...buy some real thick DIAPERS and expect a 'Knock Knock' real soon.
And in your opinion who is said psycho?
 
The post box is before the bridge on her way home from work; I.e the bridge is closer to her home than the post box.
This is why I was looking at the cctv and timelines given left hand smoking man was on cctv walking towards the bridge early doors of the 19th but apparently this was actually on the 18th?
Thanks. So if she was walking to work she'd be going in the direction of the sun?
 
I'm not here for opinions.

You have no more cards to play... I'm looking at your HAND with the ability to REWIND... ZOOM and no matter what happens IN THE PRESENT you cant hide your actions in the PAST.
 
The police will have more cctv footage then they're letting on

FWIW, a couple of points about the bus CCTV and the Ranger:

1. I commented previously that from looking again at the bus CCTV Ranger appeared to be closer to the Nag’s than 46 HR - another look at the stills published early on before it was eliminated appear to confirm this (composite from the Mirror attached below). It is actually parked in front of number 50 - the white metal gatepost of number 50 appearing on the left as a vertical yellow streak in the top right and left images roughly in line with the rear wheels and the blue door of number 48 appearing in the bottom left image in line with the bonnet. So far, so mundane...

2. The still images are from another (higher) camera on the same bus (see timestamp) but much clearer than the cctv issued in the Astra appeal and apparently with a faster frame rate (frames in order of capture: top right; top left; bottom left). So not only did this camera allow identification of the Ranger, it would also have captured several frames of the vehicle in front of it and anything going on on the pavement outside number 46 at the time.

Mirror composite and October 2009 streetview images below.

D1C4ED8F-610C-4289-B123-B4C8092C77FA.jpegA2291D75-1018-410B-BDD0-6CB96D2DC7AD.jpeg
 
Last edited:
FWIW, a couple of points about the bus CCTV and the Ranger:

1. I commented previously that from looking again at the bus CCTV Ranger appeared to be closer to the Nag’s than 46 HR - another look at the stills published early on before it was eliminated appear to confirm this (composite from the Mirror attached below). It is actually parked in front of number 50 - the white metal gatepost of number 50 appearing on the left as a vertical yellow streak in the top right and left images roughly in line with the rear wheels and the blue door of number 48 appearing in the bottom left image in line with the bonnet. So far, so mundane...

2. The still images are from another (higher) camera on the same bus (see timestamp) but much clearer than the cctv issued in the Astra appeal and apparently with a faster frame rate (frames in order of capture: top right; top left; bottom left). So not only did this camera allow identification of the Ranger, it would also have captured several frames of the vehicle in front of it and anything going on on the pavement outside number 46 at the time.

Mirror composite and October 2009 streetview images below.

View attachment 393863View attachment 393864
That’s a good spot - from that footage the number plate would surely be visible. The image much better
 
That’s a good spot - from that footage the number plate would surely be visible. The image much better

You would at least be in with a good shout of identifying the make and model. That said, the area around the front right wing of the Ranger in the top left image is currently engaging my attention.
 
You would at least be in with a good shout of identifying the make and model. That said, the area around the front right wing of the Ranger in the top left image is currently engaging my attention.
Well this is where I found the image of the emerging man - everything seems to go quiet when I’ve shown it before - some sleuths saying it’s just reflections - it’s clearly a man, dressed similarly to alley man - though his trouser bottoms appear to have silver flouresent stripes - like road workers wear
 
Hi Becci, I think a point is he always comes from the front and he always approaches from the nags end of the road. What is interesting is firstly - he could have been staying at the nags head and this would perhaps explain the times of his movements. Secondly A.C. Lives (at the time) in the opposite direction - so if he was to approach Claudias you’d expect him to come from the opposite direction. (Unless he was staying at the nags of course) . I think it is a possibility - my only problem with this theory is when alleyman hesitates for white jacket man - I believe white jacket man is A.C. - he comes from the right direction and is dressed as he’s known to dress plus he’s the right build and shape of A.C.? Which then means alleywayman isn’t cooper.

I don't think white jacket man is AC as he used to wear a brown mac as did the man seen outside Claudias house by a witness at 6.45am on the morning of Miss Lawrence’s disappearance - March 19

 
FWIW, a couple of points about the bus CCTV and the Ranger:

1. I commented previously that from looking again at the bus CCTV Ranger appeared to be closer to the Nag’s than 46 HR - another look at the stills published early on before it was eliminated appear to confirm this (composite from the Mirror attached below). It is actually parked in front of number 50 - the white metal gatepost of number 50 appearing on the left as a vertical yellow streak in the top right and left images roughly in line with the rear wheels and the blue door of number 48 appearing in the bottom left image in line with the bonnet. So far, so mundane...

2. The still images are from another (higher) camera on the same bus (see timestamp) but much clearer than the cctv issued in the Astra appeal and apparently with a faster frame rate (frames in order of capture: top right; top left; bottom left). So not only did this camera allow identification of the Ranger, it would also have captured several frames of the vehicle in front of it and anything going on on the pavement outside number 46 at the time.

Mirror composite and October 2009 streetview images below.

View attachment 393863View attachment 393864
Just looking - do you think that’s Claudia lying dead or dying?
 
Is there video footage of the higher positioned bus camera? Or just stills?
 
Everyone seems to have disappeared. I remember watching an appeal featuring Jk she was saying she often cleaned Claudias windows - I wonder if she cleaned the floor outside the windows as well!!
 
New thread:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
89
Guests online
214
Total visitors
303

Forum statistics

Threads
608,630
Messages
18,242,670
Members
234,401
Latest member
CRIM1959
Back
Top