If they [fingerprints] weren't found on the bin, who opened the lid?
Could the alleged error with the weight of the bin be a cover for a tragic accident caused by the lorry reversing into Corrie. Driver could have panicked and put him in the cab or in the back of the lorry. Is there any possibility that someone knows he will be found at the landfill and the 'weight' admission is a cover up? I just can't get my head around why it has taken so long for them to find out the weight was wrong, it doesn't make sense. Does anyone find it odd that UT has been so quiet?
It beggars belief that such a dreadful thing can happen in a relatively small market town.
Very good points. Also I don't believe the police had the resources to instantly check the landfill. It is a huge task given the size of the area they have to search and to assign dozens of officers to search there would mean a lot of changes to staff rotas etc.Hindsight is always 20/20.
Biffa was obviously over-confident that this could never happen, and the police can't go around disbelieving reputable companies, and assuming they are lying or incompetent.
I also think SP had to pursue the other evidence because it might a) have lead to Corrie while still alive or b) have lead to evidence of a crime. Their focus is on solving crimes, not accidents.
If anything was in the landfill, it wasn't going to go anywhere, whereas witness memories might fade, perps might cover their tracks, forensic evidence of a crime scene could be compromised.
Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
He was in recycling which was brought to landfill rather than to be processed.If they do find evidence of Corrie in the landfill.
My confusion is, was Corrie actually in a general waste bin, which if he was I can't see him climbing into one as the smell would be off putting. Unless he climbed up and then accidentally fell in to it.
Or was Corrie in the recycling bin but it was taken straight to landfill? I'm struggling with nothing being seen during the recycling process. Unless industrial recycling is done differently to household recycling.
Do you have a link for this fact? That may possibly be the next revelation but that has not been admitted I don't think, as yet, has it?He was in recycling which was brought to landfill rather than to be processed.
Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk
He was in recycling which was brought to landfill rather than to be processed.
Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk
He was in recycling which was brought to landfill rather than to be processed.
I only come on here sporadically so please forgive me if this has been said....But surely when the bin man pulled the bin out to attach it to the lorry he must've realised it was substantially heavier than it usually felt if it's only card and paper???
No link so I should have said imo but it is the only logical conclusion. He must have been in the recycling due to the weight of bin and the phone pings. Had the waste been processed at a recycling depot he would have been spotted.Do you have a link for this fact? That may possibly be the next revelation but that has not been admitted I don't think, as yet, has it?
What the Police need to do - and I have NO DOUBT they haven't done this, is:
Get a phone exactly the same make as CMs, put it on the same network, put it in the back of the actual truck, and drive it about and see if it can ping the masts.
If the back of the truck is earthed and it can't, he was in the cab and it's a murder.
If it can then maybe he was in the back and it's an accident.
They might be able to see the signal strength of the phone and infer one or the other.
But either way they NEED to do this to MAKE SURE.
<modsnip>
I wonder if the bin has been saved as evidence as the one thing it would have is finger prints
I only come on here sporadically so please forgive me if this has been said....But surely when the bin man pulled the bin out to attach it to the lorry he must've realised it was substantially heavier than it usually felt if it's only card and paper???