From Julia Reid Tweet
Delaney: it is not possible to quantify the amount of force applied or the duration of compression.
Delaney: it is not possible to quantify the amount of force applied or the duration of compression.
As long as the prosecution can show that she died by strangulation by his hands, and that it took a significant amount of time, I can't see that he has a snowball's chance in hell of a manslaughter verdict.
If they can only tell to this degree of accuracy and she was drinking cider in the pub, maybe they can't tell if she drank cider at home, especially as there was only a small amount missing from the open bottle
TM- 'love you, bus is very quiet and tame only me and nic drinking'
VT: Love you too, hopefully party is more lively, just got home. Missing you *advertiser censored*
Sorry, I see it has been already answered above!!
Asked if screams and thud heard by Lehman's over matter of a few seconds could be time frame of Jo's death Delaney says "it could"
Defence is definitely going to go for "not much force" for "not a long time" to tie in with "accidental death".
...the proseuction's expert witness has just admitted that he cannot quantify the duration of compression. It may have been over "in seconds".
Does the above statement [the proseuction's expert witness has just admitted that he cannot quantify the duration of compression. It may have been over "in seconds"] mean the same thing as this explanation from the prosecution?
There was a violent struggle by Miss Yeates to try and survive. Despite that VT continued to hold her neck, to kill her...he was in control, more powerful and at more than 1ft taller had the advantage. He might have let go at any point but he chose not to. He knew that she was in pain and struggling to breathe...death was not instantaneous...the strangulation would have been uncomfortable and painful. Two hands were used. Her neck was held for long enough and hard enough for it to kill.
rupertevelyn
Asked if injuries to Jo were suffered during life? Delaney responds "Yes". #JoYeates
I though the defence were going to claim the screams were unrelated!
Does the above statement mean the same thing as this explanation from the prosecution?
There was a violent struggle by Miss Yeates to try and survive. Despite that VT continued to hold her neck, to kill her...he was in control, more powerful and at more than 1ft taller had the advantage. He might have let go at any point but he chose not to. He knew that she was in pain and struggling to breathe...death was not instantaneous...the strangulation would have been uncomfortable and painful. Two hands were used. Her neck was held for long enough and hard enough for it to kill.
Defence asks why the use of the broom handle to attach the straps to move #Joannayeates' body was not in statement.
Exactly! (I was trying to be subtle in my post. )The defence will argue that the second statement is simply the prosecution "bigging it up". If the expert witness says that he cannot quantify the duration (or the amount of force) used, and it could all have been over in seconds, that is a scenario that the jury will be obliged to consider.
It happens all the time. Pop round to see the neighbour and seconds later they are dead in the hallway.
The trouble is, the proseuction's expert witness has just admitted that he cannot quantify the duration of compression. It may have been over "in seconds".