Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I cant help wondering why that video and all the website content was removed? surley from CCTV they know if it is VT or not as they would have got a close up when he entered waitrose and left? if it is him it looks very much like he saw her, then quickly departed so he could be at the flat before her, then waiting round the side of the flat, as soon as she opened the door attacked her, hence the immediate scream, i dont buy the arm around her stuff or the her letting him in. if that video is him then i think it was premeditated.
I think that they are referring to his lawyer at the time of his arrest aren't they?
So...there's been no mention of VT's fingerprints or DNA having been found...or so far.. in Jo's flat - is that right? So presumably they found neither. Did he really manage not to touch anything in that flat, or leave any trace that he was there? Or did he pretty efficiently manage to erase any traces before he left the flat with Jo's body?
I cant help wondering why that video and all the website content was removed? surley from CCTV they know if it is VT or not as they would have got a close up when he entered waitrose and left? if it is him it looks very much like he saw her, then quickly departed so he could be at the flat before her, then waiting round the side of the flat, as soon as she opened the door attacked her, hence the immediate scream, i dont buy the arm around her stuff or the her letting him in. if that video is him then i think it was premeditated.
I totally missed that - attagirl, as you say!
[Forgive me for what I am about to say... Pity she didn't take the *@%£±$'s eye out!!!]
sorry that was me that raised the point about the car - I read somewhere something that implied she was thinking of visiting and that RS told her the traffic would be awful (perhaps they meant the weather). So I just assumed she had use of a car that night.
I dont think they can withhold anything.... I'm by no means a legal expert but I thought both prosecution and defence had to 'disclose' all evidence?
you're right - they haven't even mentioned the door.
DC Thomas says Tabak was overly interested in the forensic examination of the flat and why the front door had been seized. She found it odd
#JoYeates boyfriend recalls they would always keep their front door double locked - whether in or out. Windows were also locked.
Joanna Yeates' boyfriend Greg Reardon is giving evidence at the trial of Vincent Tabak. He says they always double locked their flat
Greg says he is unsure if any lights were on when he got in. He thinks he only used the Yale lock to get in the front door.
Sky tweeted that it was a '6 inch x 1 cm scar on his left arm' - I think the prosecution would have a job proving JY caused that (with her short fingernails) ... he could make up any ol BS as to how that happened in the month before his arrest.
The nurse found a 6x1 cm scar with scab on his left arm and a bruised toe nail.
#VincentTabak had 6cm pink scar with a scab on his left arm, when examined at police station, court hears.
I don't think they said 6 inches
From Skynewsgather
from Martin Evans
my mistake Clio..... I immediately think in inches first!! I still think he can pass that off with some *advertiser censored* and bull story.... hasn't a witness said that at a dinner party he was playing with the cats? he could claim one of them scratched him.....IIRC there was none of his DNA found on JY's fingernails, just her own blood?
There were blood stains on the sole and toe of Miss Yeates' sock and on her finger nails, court hears.
Re VT declining to answer questions, I heard on the radio ( Radio 4 PM I think) that VT's lawyer advised him to give a "no comment" interview.