I didn't know his front door had been tampered with.
btw sleuth-d, do you know for sure he was arrested at his home?
I can't copy the pic right now but look at the map and the photo number 5, under the '2 Homes cordoned off' icon https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=z9ujZkJ3xpI4.khYjBF8n1aVo
So whoever reported them must have known on the Sunday that Kayleigh was missing already ? a friend of the family then ? as dont think there was any announcement by the police on that day, was there ?
I didn't see it myself but somebody mentioned that Kayleigh's brother was asking if anybody knew where LH was on Sunday. I imagine at some point they had spoken to Kayleigh's best friend and realised she wasn't stopping there and possibly got the name from her.
Aahh, it's been a long day at the end of a very long week for me .......... of course ! parents would have checked the supposed whereabouts of Kayleigh, discovered the lies and then got LHs name from the friend.
and then I wonder exactly what it was that made them make the arrests so quickly ? I mean LH and SB could have said Kayleigh had departed back home far as they knew.
I can't copy the pic right now but look at the map and the photo number 5, under the '2 Homes cordoned off' icon https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=z9ujZkJ3xpI4.khYjBF8n1aVo
Could the broken lock be due to an early morning raid type arrest?no, not for sure...
http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/m...goes-missing/story-28183887-detail/story.html
"Two men, aged 27 and 28, have been arrested in connection with Kayleigh's disappearance.
They were detained in the Coalville and Ibstock areas late on Sunday night/early Monday morning and are being questioned by detectives."
i assumed most likely, that in the early hours he would have been at home, but you are right... he could have been driving around the ibstock area... or at someone else's house i suppose.
Door looks fine to me. I am feverish and half asleep though.
Btw, thanks for everyone's replies to my earlier long post.
Edinlass, I hope you didn't think I was portraying LH as a victim, or being disrespectful to Kayleigh and her family. I don't see him as a victim at all, but equally don't like to see him condemned for more than he has been charged with. And that is not the same as saying we shouldn't speculate that he had further involvement either. I just needed to check out why others may have him down as some sort of evil monster, when I see his behaviour as reprehensible and wrong, and possibly bordering on perverse, but not sick, based on the charges. I don't know maybe I'm making it worse and not explaining properly.
I don't want anyone to feel they can't say what they want to because of what I've posted, and I suppose I needed to explore my own morals and values a bit more.
For LH not to be charged (yet) in connection with the murder, he must have given a story of not being with SB after he last saw Kayleigh.
Perhaps LH went to his family home after kayleigh left, and SB then followed Kayleigh. It must have been pretty instantaneous for her to not have got very far, or an offer of a lift to drop her back near her home, but then I'm not getting why the phone was found on the path.
Or SB could have offered them both a lift home. LH doesnt drive, Kayleigh obviously doesnt.....and if local bus service there is like it is round by me on a Sunday, then buses would be thin on the ground.
Drops LH off first and then tries it on with Kayleigh, with tragic results.
Police track down LH that evening, he says SB dropped him off and then took Kayleigh home.
Police then track down SB who can't offer good enough story and is brought in for questioning, as being the last known person to see Kayleigh.
Only thing that doesn't work in this scenario though is why would SB double back towards Ibstock to leave Kayleigh's body there. If he was already at Coalville he would likely go further north towards Belton ( which he knows well ).