nursebeeme
Registered User
- Joined
- May 3, 2008
- Messages
- 53,158
- Reaction score
- 220
The two threads on this are now merged.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Captain_Khan;10126457]Is it really a smart idea for the British media to claim that an arrest is imminent? Surely, if you were a burglar in the area and you have a vested interest in this case, as soon as you realized the media could be discussing your arrest, you'd flee as fast as you could. It's not really in the best interests of law enforcement to publish things like this, is it
I think there is confusion on what this alleged letter contains. I don't think it specifically says they want these 3 burglars interviewed or arrested. IMO it asks Portuguese officials to help with the investigation. From the other thread the letter was sent to 31 other countries. The tabloids ran with it and made up this story.
From your link
According to the tabloid, Scotland Yard want to quiz three burglars who carried out raids in the Portuguese resort when the three-year-old vanished.
I was only commenting on what the LE in portugal said.
Yes Portugal reopened the case. Scotland Yard did not provide evidence against the McCanns as far as we know. They're on the McCanns side looking for the perps.Could robbers have accidentally killed Maddie in the flat, thus panic starts so the actual robbery is thwarted? *That would explain the dogs hitting in the apt. and it would also explain why nothing was stolen. *Maybe body was taken because they had been chased off earlier by a couple and didn't want to become suspects, no body no arrest? **
I admit I haven't read all the evidence. *One thing I can't fathom is 7 people lying about the death of a child. I can honestly say I do not know 7 people that would do such a thing.
*Also, did the investigators in Portugal reopen the case, and did Scotland yard provide evidence against the McCanns?
Not wanting to debate, just trying to figure things out and I know you guys know the case inside and out, and I honestly don't. *Feel free to rip my theory apart lol. *I seem to side with parents in cases like these, not sure why, but I am aware of this emotional downfall, and try to be open minded. * Although I always felt Susan Smith, Casey Anthony, Lisa Irwins parents, Hailey Cummings parents, *were guilty from the start. *
***
Just heard Mark Fuhrman talking about this on Fox news. He said it was unlikely British authorities considered these three burglars serious suspects because otherwise, they probably wouldn't telegraph their intentions in the media, allowing the three to get their stories together or simply run away. He also said that if there was no physical evidence left behind of a single intruder, three intruders was even less likely.
Just heard Mark Fuhrman talking about this on Fox news. He said it was unlikely British authorities considered these three burglars serious suspects because otherwise, they probably wouldn't telegraph their intentions in the media, allowing the three to get their stories together or simply run away. He also said that if there was no physical evidence left behind of a single intruder, three intruders was even less likely.
Just heard Mark Fuhrman talking about this on Fox news. He said it was unlikely British authorities considered these three burglars serious suspects because otherwise, they probably wouldn't telegraph their intentions in the media, allowing the three to get their stories together or simply run away. He also said that if there was no physical evidence left behind of a single intruder, three intruders was even less likely.
folks, just a random reminder... please do not discuss other posters or what position they may or may not have. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. The reason that this forum was closed for so long was the repeated personal attacks and discussing one another and not the case at hand. We are not going to go down that road again and there will be zero tolerance for this. This is not directed at any post in particular as I have seen this issue cropping up from the very first post.
Carry on.
:werk:
From google it looks like Wiki leaks uncovered information that British police developed evidence against M's, which I find odd after reading this statement from Assange....comparing himself to the M's after the information was released. Ugh confusing case.
Was Madelines DNA really found in the rental car? I have read conflicting reports.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17626346
but but but I was the very first post....
I am so confused about the rules....it seems that I always break them and I don't know what I do wrong....I look at other posts (not in this thread, just anywhere in general) and I don't know how the posts are allowed to stay.
One day I'm sure to be banned from WS forever and I won't even know why.
:tears:
From google it looks like Wiki leaks uncovered information that British police developed evidence against M's, which I find odd after reading this statement from Assange....comparing himself to the M's after the information was released. Ugh confusing case.
Was Madelines DNA really found in the rental car? I have read conflicting reports.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17626346