Found Deceased UK - Leah Croucher - Emerson Valley - Milton Keynes - #7

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

Teenager Leah Croucher tried to defend herself using martial arts against a convicted child sex offender who sexually assaulted and killed her before dismembering her body, an inquest has heard.

How would the police know - are they just guessing here?

Maxwell, 49, had a 'predilection for young females' and was being hunted by police at the time Leah went missing. Officers even had a tip off about Maxwell but concluded there was no link between him and Leah. The name of Maxwell came up in May 2019 after a member of the public called up to provide information, but officers concluded there was no link between him and Leah, DSI Brown said.

How & why did they come to that conclusion?

On Monday October 10 2022, the investigation finally found Leah after receiving a call from a man doing maintenance work. 'He was trying to eradicate a smell from the property, which took him into the loft area where he discovered what he thought were human remains', DSI Brown said. The owners of the 'unremarkable' four-bedroom semi-detached house in Loxbeare Drive, Furzton, lived abroad and used the property as a holiday home, but had not returned since the Covid pandemic broke out in early 2020, the officer said.

Leah disappeared on 15 February 2019, so what date were the owners last at the property? If it was in 2019, did they not notice a smell? The smell would have been pretty pungent shortly after her death, if people were in the property sometime in 2019 then why did they not notice anything?
 

The court heard Maxwell - who had been at the property and, as a maintenance man, was the only person to have keys - was later found dead elsewhere in Milton Keynes in 2019. He had committed suicide and died from hanging.

What happened to the keys to the property? Did Maxwell complete the work he was supposed to do? How do the police know that he didn't contract the work at Loxbeare Drive out to anyone else?

Maxwell had been on the run from police in connection with a sexual assault in Newport Pagnell in November 2018. The inquest heard Maxwell had gone missing and proved 'impossible to find' for three months after an allegation was made against him on November 29 2018.

So does that mean they made contact with him 3 months after November 2018? That would be February 2019, the month Leah disappeared.

Detective Chief Superintendent Joseph Kidman told the inquest that there were 1,975 sex offenders in the area they were searching, and Maxwell was a registered level-one sex offender.

So there were nearly 2,000 sex offenders in the area they were searching, and they never considered that Leah was potentially a victim of one of these?
 
I'd also be interested to know what was in maxwells suicide note? Did he make any reference to leah? Shocking the police had a tip off about him being possibly involved in leah disappearance in 2019 and police brushed it off. Because it must've been from someone who knew he was in the area she went missing! How do they know he was the handyman at the property if he had changed his appearance and was using fake identity? I doubt he got the work using his real name? Still alot of unanswered questions. Leahs family have been brave and stoic and extremely patient through all these years waiting for answers. My thoughts are with them today and Leah. Xx
 


Her father John delivered an emotional statement outside of court where he told how his daughter had been described as 'loyal, fierce, pure, with an infectious giggle and a smile that was always present'.

He said that Leah was 'severely let down' by police and probation services after a coroner concluded that Leah was 'murdered' by Neil Maxwell following a series of failures by the authorities.

Mr Croucher said that Maxwell 'was very clearly a dangerous individual' who 'benefitted from the failings [...], meaning he was able to slip through the gaps of proper and robust management'.

'It is astonishing that a repeatedly convicted sexual offender could possibly have been given a sentence as lenient as a community order,' he added.

'He should never have been at large, and if he hadn't been at large he wouldn't have been in a position to cause Leah's death.

'It is important to note, and we will never forget that these failings not only allowed this repeat offender to assault others and kill our Leah, but also led to the death of Leah's brother Haydon who never recovered from Leah going missing and was so distraught he took his own life.'
 

Thames Valley Police has defended its Leah Croucher investigation after an inquest ruled she 'probably died defending herself from sex attacker Neil Maxwell'. Now Thames Valley Police has defended its handling of the case and reiterated that Maxwell was responsible.

Why has there been no mention of Maxwell's suicide note in the inquest? I hope Leah's family push for the contents of it to be made public.
 

Thames Valley Police has defended its Leah Croucher investigation after an inquest ruled she 'probably died defending herself from sex attacker Neil Maxwell'. Now Thames Valley Police has defended its handling of the case and reiterated that Maxwell was responsible.

Why has there been no mention of Maxwell's suicide note in the inquest? I hope Leah's family push for the contents of it to be made public.
Also, why has no mention been made of mobile phone evidence from NM's phone for proof of location on the day LC died, text messages etc. Will NM's inquest details now be publicly available, after being restricted for so long?
 
Quite a lot is still not adding up about this.

1. If he changed his appearance and used fake ID how do they know for definite it was him who was actually in Loxbeare drive? If he didn't use a car how did he get the keys?

2. If he stopped using his phone how was he contacted by the house owners (who live abroad) to carry out the maintenance work? How was he paid?

3. He contacted his mum to tell her intention of taking his own life, did he confess to his mum his reasons why? Did he tell her about Leah?

4. He left a suicide note - did he mention leah in this?

5. It was revealed at inquest that horrifically leah was dismembered - him being a maintenance man likely means he probably had tools to do this, where were his tools when he committed suicide? I hate even saying this but it obviously would make quite a mess - so was there DNA evidence on his tools? If i remember correctly when leah was first missing the police searched her family home looking for DNA evidence so they clearly have her DNA on file.

6. The person who tipped off police about a possible link between Maxwell and leah did so in may 2019 - this was a month after maxwell had killed himself so was this person in fact his mum ?? Whoever it was knew he was in the area that leah disappeared to make the connection themselves to suggest it to police.

7. How long was maxwell at the property before he attacked leah? Had he been watching her for weeks? (Again why was he even out in the first place and to think there is another 2000 sexual predators also within that area turns my stomach).

8. Police searched 4000 homes around furzton lake, Loxbeare drive etc. Why why why did they not try harder to search the houses that were abandoned/empty? That just should have been a massive red flag, if you're looking for a missing girl and you get no answer from knocking at a house on the road she disappeared from surely that should have been seen as suspicious? Because it's likely maxwell was still in the property for days or even the full two months after he killed leah. Police could have surely got the keys from whoever managed the house in the owners absence? Were the keys still with maxwell?? He was probably watching everyone looking for leah the whole time!
 
Last edited:
Quite a lot is still not adding up about this.

1. If he changed his appearance and used fake ID how do they know for definite it was him who was actually in Loxbeare drive? If he didn't use a car hiw did he get the keys?

2. If he stopped using his phone how was he contacted by the house owners (who live abroad) to carry out the maintenance work? How was he paid?

3. He contacted his mum to tell her intention of taking his own life, did he confess to his mum his reasons why? Did he tell her about Leah?

4. He left a suicide note - did he mention leah in this?

5. It was revealed at inquest that horrifically leah was dismembered - him being a maintenance man likely means he probably had tools to do this, where were his tools when he committed suicide? I hate even saying this but it obviously would make quite a mess - so was there DNA evidence on his tools? If i remember correctly when leah was first missing the police searched her family home looking for DNA evidence so they clearly have her DNA on file.

6. The person who tipped off police about a possible link between Maxwell and leah did so in may 2019 - this was a month after maxwell had killed himself so was this person in fact his mum ?? Whoever it was knew he was in the area that leah disappeared to make the connection themselves to suggest it to police.

7. How long was maxwell at the property before he attacked leah? Had he been watching her for weeks? (Again why was he even out in the first place and to think there is another 2000 sexual predators also within that area turns my stomach).

8. Police searched 4000 homes around furzton lake, Loxbeare drive etc. Why why why did they not try harder to search the houses that were abandoned/empty? That just should have been a massive red flag, if you're looking for a missing girl and you get no answer from knocking at a house on the road she disappeared from surely that should have been seen as suspicious? Because it's likely maxwell was still in the property for days or even the full two months after he killed leah. Police could have surely got the keys from whoever managed the house in the owners absence? Were the keys still with maxwell?? He was probably watching everyone looking for leah the whole time!
I am still not convinced it was him, if he was using a false name to evade police how would police know what that name was, suppose the Kuwaiti owners said “we gave a set of keys to John Smith” how would police link that to him?

Just feels he being used as a convenient scapegoat to divert from police incompetence, lets blame her death on a guy who can’t answer back
 
suppose the Kuwaiti owners said “we gave a set of keys to John Smith” how would police link that to him?
Yes this is what doesn't make sense. If he was using fake name etc. How did they link him to that fake name to know for definite it was him in the property? I feel like there is something else the police are holding back.

I do think it was likely was him but i think the reason they know this for definite is because he confessed before killing himself (either to his mum or in the suicide note) but for some reason no one made the connection or took it seriously? If he didn't have a phone he may never have even known leahs name. But i do think you make a good point that could also be true. It just feels like a police cover up. I thought inquests were so the family have answers, if anything this has raised even more questions!
 

A number of failings have been found’ which may have played a part in the death of Milton Keynes victim Leah Croucher’s death, a coroner has ruled. The inquest found there was a failure to monitor the convicted sex offender – who was wanted for a further sex attack in Newport Pagnall in November 2018.

Mr Osborne pointed to an inexperienced probation officer supervising Maxwell, the risk that Neil Maxwell posed to the public generally was underestimated and unreported, a failure in the monitoring process of Neil Maxwell with regards to his attendance at appointments and for him to live at the address he was supposed to live at, a failure in the risk assessment carried out and a failure to properly share information across between police and probation in regards to the "Visor" system.

Visor refers to the Violent and Sex Offender Register.

However, Mr Osborne said these failings, on balance, did not contribute directly to Leah's death. "Whilst there were failings in the monitoring process it remains speculative to say that these failings contributed directly to her death. "I cannot therefore conclude that those failings identified contributed to her death. Although it may be possible that those findings may have played a part in her death."

Leah's death was ruled as an unlawful killing and the cause of death was ruled as unascertained.
 

A number of failings have been found’ which may have played a part in the death of Milton Keynes victim Leah Croucher’s death, a coroner has ruled. The inquest found there was a failure to monitor the convicted sex offender – who was wanted for a further sex attack in Newport Pagnall in November 2018.

Mr Osborne pointed to an inexperienced probation officer supervising Maxwell, the risk that Neil Maxwell posed to the public generally was underestimated and unreported, a failure in the monitoring process of Neil Maxwell with regards to his attendance at appointments and for him to live at the address he was supposed to live at, a failure in the risk assessment carried out and a failure to properly share information across between police and probation in regards to the "Visor" system.

Visor refers to the Violent and Sex Offender Register.

However, Mr Osborne said these failings, on balance, did not contribute directly to Leah's death. "Whilst there were failings in the monitoring process it remains speculative to say that these failings contributed directly to her death. "I cannot therefore conclude that those failings identified contributed to her death. Although it may be possible that those findings may have played a part in her death."

Leah's death was ruled as an unlawful killing and the cause of death was ruled as unascertained.
Well, if there hadn't been "failures in the monitoring process" this dreadful man would likely have been in custody for the 2018 Newport Pagnell attack and not roaming around where he could get hold of Leah. I'd say that means the failings absolutely contributed to her death.
I really feel Leah and her poor family have been seriously let down by the Police throughout
 
Well, if there hadn't been "failures in the monitoring process" this dreadful man would likely have been in custody for the 2018 Newport Pagnell attack and not roaming around where he could get hold of Leah. I'd say that means the failings absolutely contributed to her death.
I really feel Leah and her poor family have been seriously let down by the Police throughout
I totally agree with your post @Noseyjosie, the failures of the system did lead to the death of Leah and also the sexual assaults on other women by Maxwell. This man was a danger to the public right from the early 2000's but he was allowed to get away with his crimes time and time again.
 
This report is from a year ago, 13 June 2023. It's about details of Maxwell's death ''seriously jeopardising'' the murder investigation:


Days after the tragic discovery, police named handyman and convicted sex offender Neil Maxwell as the prime suspect in their murder investigation. But there was to be no arrest or trial – for Maxwell had taken his own life in April 2019, two months after Leah vanished.

Last October, immediately after he was declared a suspect, national press requested to see the public record of the inquest into his death, wondering if it would provide any vital clues to connect him with Leah. But, unusually, coroner Tom Osborne refused to release the details, initially promising they would be made public after a few weeks. When November came, he still refused to make them public, saying police believed the release could "seriously jeopardise" the murder investigation.

At the time Mr Osborne said: "I received a request from Det Ch Supt Ian Hunter, who is overseeing the investigation into the death of Leah Croucher, to withhold disclosure of the record of inquest for a further short period of time as it contains information that is sensitive to their continuing investigation, and by releasing that information into the public domain at this stage may seriously jeopardise the investigation. "The presumption in favour of open and transparent justice would normally dictate that I disclose the record of inquest.

"However, I have every reason to believe that disclosure of the document at this stage may seriously compromise and indeed jeopardise the ongoing investigation into the death of Leah Croucher, and for that reason the balance is in favour of not disclosing the document, for the time being, although it is a matter that will be kept under constant review and it will be released at the earliest opportunity. "The risks of compromise to the continuing investigation outweigh the need for disclosure."

The inquest details released this week contain only Maxwell’s name, date and place of birth (9 February 1970 in Bushey, Hertfordshire) and minimum details about his death. His occupation is stated as ‘builder’ and his address as North Street, CMK.

He died on 20 April 2019 and the place of death was recorded as ‘Bike shed, Mainstay Court, Campbell Park’. The cause of death was hanging and the verdict was suicide. The record states: “He left a suicide note.”


Maybe it's just me but, apart from the details of the suicide note, what else about Maxwell's inquest would seriously jeopardise the murder investigation? I cannot fathom out what else it could possibly be? Are they covering up what is in his suicide note?



 
This report is from a year ago, 13 June 2023. It's about details of Maxwell's death ''seriously jeopardising'' the murder investigation:


Days after the tragic discovery, police named handyman and convicted sex offender Neil Maxwell as the prime suspect in their murder investigation. But there was to be no arrest or trial – for Maxwell had taken his own life in April 2019, two months after Leah vanished.

Last October, immediately after he was declared a suspect, national press requested to see the public record of the inquest into his death, wondering if it would provide any vital clues to connect him with Leah. But, unusually, coroner Tom Osborne refused to release the details, initially promising they would be made public after a few weeks. When November came, he still refused to make them public, saying police believed the release could "seriously jeopardise" the murder investigation.

At the time Mr Osborne said: "I received a request from Det Ch Supt Ian Hunter, who is overseeing the investigation into the death of Leah Croucher, to withhold disclosure of the record of inquest for a further short period of time as it contains information that is sensitive to their continuing investigation, and by releasing that information into the public domain at this stage may seriously jeopardise the investigation. "The presumption in favour of open and transparent justice would normally dictate that I disclose the record of inquest.

"However, I have every reason to believe that disclosure of the document at this stage may seriously compromise and indeed jeopardise the ongoing investigation into the death of Leah Croucher, and for that reason the balance is in favour of not disclosing the document, for the time being, although it is a matter that will be kept under constant review and it will be released at the earliest opportunity. "The risks of compromise to the continuing investigation outweigh the need for disclosure."

The inquest details released this week contain only Maxwell’s name, date and place of birth (9 February 1970 in Bushey, Hertfordshire) and minimum details about his death. His occupation is stated as ‘builder’ and his address as North Street, CMK.

He died on 20 April 2019 and the place of death was recorded as ‘Bike shed, Mainstay Court, Campbell Park’. The cause of death was hanging and the verdict was suicide. The record states: “He left a suicide note.”


Maybe it's just me but, apart from the details of the suicide note, what else about Maxwell's inquest would seriously jeopardise the murder investigation? I cannot fathom out what else it could possibly be? Are they covering up what is in his suicide note?
Additional link from BBC News, which says much the same as the one in the post above. I totally agree that this doesn't constitute something that would jeapordise the LC investigation. JMO, I think there's quite a lot of withheld information in both the LC unlawful death investigation by police and NM's suicide circumstances.
 
Quite a lot is still not adding up about this.

1. If he changed his appearance and used fake ID how do they know for definite it was him who was actually in Loxbeare drive? If he didn't use a car how did he get the keys?

2. If he stopped using his phone how was he contacted by the house owners (who live abroad) to carry out the maintenance work? How was he paid?

3. He contacted his mum to tell her intention of taking his own life, did he confess to his mum his reasons why? Did he tell her about Leah?

4. He left a suicide note - did he mention leah in this?

5. It was revealed at inquest that horrifically leah was dismembered - him being a maintenance man likely means he probably had tools to do this, where were his tools when he committed suicide? I hate even saying this but it obviously would make quite a mess - so was there DNA evidence on his tools? If i remember correctly when leah was first missing the police searched her family home looking for DNA evidence so they clearly have her DNA on file.

6. The person who tipped off police about a possible link between Maxwell and leah did so in may 2019 - this was a month after maxwell had killed himself so was this person in fact his mum ?? Whoever it was knew he was in the area that leah disappeared to make the connection themselves to suggest it to police.

7. How long was maxwell at the property before he attacked leah? Had he been watching her for weeks? (Again why was he even out in the first place and to think there is another 2000 sexual predators also within that area turns my stomach).

8. Police searched 4000 homes around furzton lake, Loxbeare drive etc. Why why why did they not try harder to search the houses that were abandoned/empty? That just should have been a massive red flag, if you're looking for a missing girl and you get no answer from knocking at a house on the road she disappeared from surely that should have been seen as suspicious? Because it's likely maxwell was still in the property for days or even the full two months after he killed leah. Police could have surely got the keys from whoever managed the house in the owners absence? Were the keys still with maxwell?? He was probably watching everyone looking for leah the whole time!
I Agree Holly AND there was a TVP notice that appealed to anyone who had ever seen Maxwell in MK let alone near the property. I believe I read they found no evidence forensically linking him to the property. If anyone remembers these comments please assist as I can’t find the article.
Sadly TVP have not acknowledged the investigative errors. I live nearby and when they visited us I pointed out at least five empty properties owned by persons abroad.
I know of no entries to these empty properties and of course the lead detective was still on tv saying he personally felt she had gone of her own accord… yeh like taking just her work clothes and no cash or passport. It was obvious to us, but seemingly not to the investigation team.
Whilst it may not have helped our dear Leah the delays caused another tragedy. A big shame the coroner did not tease these points out to minimise a repeat.
We all feel devastated for her wrecked family I wish they could feel the love we feel for them
 
I Agree Holly AND there was a TVP notice that appealed to anyone who had ever seen Maxwell in MK let alone near the property. I believe I read they found no evidence forensically linking him to the property. If anyone remembers these comments please assist as I can’t find the article.
Sadly TVP have not acknowledged the investigative errors. I live nearby and when they visited us I pointed out at least five empty properties owned by persons abroad.
I know of no entries to these empty properties and of course the lead detective was still on tv saying he personally felt she had gone of her own accord… yeh like taking just her work clothes and no cash or passport. It was obvious to us, but seemingly not to the investigation team.
Whilst it may not have helped our dear Leah the delays caused another tragedy. A big shame the coroner did not tease these points out to minimise a repeat.
We all feel devastated for her wrecked family I wish they could feel the love we feel for them
BBM

I found this report if it helps

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-64386555
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
236
Guests online
274
Total visitors
510

Forum statistics

Threads
608,499
Messages
18,240,377
Members
234,389
Latest member
Roberto859
Back
Top