I agree with you, I wonder if there will be any other charges relating to other woman once this trial is over?
It will be interesting to see what comes out after the trial ends.Not long to wait.
I agree with you, I wonder if there will be any other charges relating to other woman once this trial is over?
I’ve had an awful thought that maybe she blacked out/fell asleep in the car on the way to Oak Road. I believe he mentions her being on her knees at one point and her laying on the grass before the ‘consensual’ sex/rape. Maybe this part of his account is true and this happened either by the car when he’s tried to get her out when they’ve arrived at Oak Road or maybe he’s carried her into the park. I’m still undecided about where I think she was attacked (the bench visited by forensics is still in my mind) But I have wondered if she may only have woken during the sexual assault and this is when she’s scratched out at him and screamed for help.
I had also wondered if there’s is further cctv from Oak road that hasn’t been publicly released as I’ve read some reports of cctv showing them both leaving the car but only PR returning but on the clips that we’ve seen there’s only flashing lights as the car’s been locked/unlocked.
If there is further cctv it would clear up any doubts about LS conscious state when they arrived at Oak Road and if she was able to walk from the car unaided. I think we’ll only find out a lot of information after the trial has ended and also that some cctv may never be released upon her families request.
All MOO
You say PR didn't know, but sometimes neither do supposed victims of rape. I mentor on a chat forum and it's desperate how many young women post on there who, from their stories, know what happened, but don't understand consent and that they have been raped, and are asking is that what happened to them.
The 'green shed' mentioned by PR in his testimony is indeed green, but would you really be able to tell that in the dark? It's a dark green, and could register as another colour in low light. Is he simply reacting to what has been presented in court?
Did he not say he'd taken his kids to the park in the past?
Yes, but in the daytime he would presumably have driven into the car park. There'd be no reason to walk along Oak Road to where the shed is.Did he not say he'd taken his kids to the park in the past?
Did he not say he'd taken his kids to the park in the past?
Apologies, I think I was responsible for that, then I infected Jarvis1969's post. Thanks for the head's up!Please everyone be careful when quoting another post, as some posts are appearing with broken quotes.
This happens when part of the quote code is accidentally deleted, even just deleting a bracket will do it.
The quoted post should start with [ QUOTE ] and end with [ /QUOTE ]
(I've left some spaces to avoid that posting as a quote itself! There should be no spaces)
If your post looks wrong, go into edit mode and replace any part of the quote code that's been deleted.
Apologies, I think I was responsible for that, then I infected Jarvis1969's post. Thanks for the head's up!
But this case has been in the news for nearly 2 years now. Surely if there were more rape victims of PR they would have contacted the police by now.It will be interesting to see what comes out after the trial ends.Not long to wait.
But this case has been in the news for nearly 2 years now. Surely if there were more rape victims of PR they would have contacted the police by now.
I see. Thanks.I have no legal knowledge,but I think any cases reported after his arrest would be kept quiet so they did not prejudice his trial.
Screaming doesn't necessarily indicate attack, it's distress. Libby could have been screaming for someone to help her, severely disorientated and hampered by numb feet in the snow.
I have been going back and forth with this. Glad you were brave and threw it out here. MOOJust throwing it out there we all assume rape followed by murder but with this sicko could the events have happened the other way around murder then sex with a dead body? A horrible thought but wouldn’t put it past PR to do this IMO
Probably mistakenly by me. I thought SA said "light". I must have confused it with another description. He doesn't appear to have said "tight" though.
On another note, do some posters realise they are referring to the defendant as PW? His initials are PR.
Or is it an in-joke and it stands for Polish ******?
ETA .... or even public wank(er)