Dotta
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2021
- Messages
- 11,648
- Reaction score
- 71,327
One does NOT exclude the other IMOMy natural instincts are very much opposed to imposing more controls on inanimate objects and substances as a method of crime control. If you have to control "things" it means you've lost control of certain sections of society by failing to educate them how to behave towards one another.
The other objection is that these methods are used by politicians as "sound-bite" easy fix solutions they use to pretend they are actually solving the problem at hand. It's a case of "doing something" regardless of what it is to turn down the political heat - just ban it, that'll sort the problem. Which it rarely does.
Someone who resorts to throwing acid in another's face is a deeply depraved individual who will resort to other means to hurt people. It's a massive lack of respect for other people (usually women), human life and wider society in general. Searching questions need to be asked as to what causes people to behave like that and why these people are living in an allegedly civilised society. IMO, obvs.
Every method is good to eradicate this particular vile crime.
Changing the society takes looooong time.
And prevention is needed NOW.
Better sooner than later.
After all, nobody wants it to spread like cancer.
From yesterday....
Horror as 52-year-old woman is left with burns after chemical attack
The horrific incident took place in the Golden Lion pub in Jay's Close, Basingstoke between 9.30pm and 10pm on Saturday.
www.dailymail.co.uk
JMO
Last edited: