UK - Lucy Letby - Post-Conviction Statutory Inquiry

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

Concerns not seen as urgent and assumptions made, inquiry hears​

12:41 BST​


Judith Moritz
Reporting from the inquiry

The Inquiry has also been hearing about the death of Child I - a baby girl, in October 2015. It was the fifth death in under five months.

Dr Steve Brearey - the lead neonatal consultant - emailed the ward manager Eirian Powell in October 2015 to register his concern that Letby had been present at each death.

Powell replied: “It is unfortunate that she [Letby] was on – however each cause of death was different, some were poorly prior to their arrival on the unit", adding others had bowel disorders, gastric bleeding and congenital abnormalities.

"This email bears reading because in many ways it sets the tone that was to follow in the subsequent months," Langdale tells this inquiry.

"Concerns, despite being raised by the consultant lead of the neonatal unit, were not seen as urgent, and assumptions surrounding the underlying medical evidence were made," she adds.

Lucy Letby hospital inquiry: ‘This is potentially very serious’ - email shows nursing boss’s concerns over Letby
 

Staffing analysis showed link between Letby's shifts and deaths​

12:47 BST​


Jonny Humphries
Reporting from the inquiry

Langdale says a meeting took place on 8 February 2016, involving Dr Brearey, Dr Jayaram, and other senior hospital figures, to discuss and review the deaths of babies where the diagnoses had been uncertain.

Ahead of that meeting, a staffing analysis had been carried out and shared via email showing the correlation between Letby’s shifts and the deaths of babies on the neonatal unit.

Dr Brearey said that the meeting reviewed the care of all the babies who died in 2015 and January 2016 and the previous reviews that had been undertaken and looked for any common themes.

Langdale says Brearey explained that after all the cases had been discussed, he then raised the issue of staffing analysis, the association with a nurse and the fact that six of the nine babies had collapsed between 00:00 and 04:00.

He said he had been concerned, because if the deaths were as a result of natural causes he would have expected them to have occurred at all times of the day or night.

The barrister tells the inquiry: “It is currently unclear whether the possibility that Letby might have something to do with the deaths of babies was explicitly discussed or whether anyone at the meeting raised the issue of an associated nurse being removed from the unit pending further investigation.”
Lucy Letby: 'Noise' about Lucy Letby's convictions has distressed victims' families, inquiry hears
 

Dispute over 'murderess on neonatal unit' meeting
13:26 BST​


Jonny Humphries
Reporting from the inquiry

Just before the break, the inquiry heard that on 16 May 2016 there was an urgent care meeting in which Dr Brearey “intimated that he thought a member of staff was causing the increase in mortality”.

Langdale says that “it was at this meeting there was allegedly reference to there being 'a murderess on the neonatal unit’.

“There is a dispute on the facts here as to what was said by who at that meeting and this will be explored in oral evidence.”

Lucy Letby hospital inquiry: ‘This is potentially very serious’ - email shows nursing boss’s concerns over Letby
 
I have to say that's a brave move from Dr brearley. Few would be brave enough to say that for the first time. Difficult to say if they had enough info to be left with any other avenue at that point though.
 
1:47pm

The inquiry is now resuming, with Rachel Langdale KC referring to the case of Child N. Letby was found guilty of attempted murder for one of the two collapses - the jury was unable to reach a verdict on the other collapse.

Mr Harvey, in his statement for Child N, said: “I do not recall being made aware of [Child N’s collapse] at the time. Given that one of the actions arising from the meeting on 11 May 2016 was to consider deteriorations, I would have expected to have been informed about this.”

Ms Kelly said: "I was not aware of this and I believe I should have been, given that we agreed a period of enhanced monitoring of collapses.”

1:48pm

Ms Langdale KC refers to 1,300 Facebook messages between her and a paediatric registrar at the hospital, between June and mid-September 2016. Some of these messages discussed the collapses of babies that Letby was involved in.

1:51pm

Ms Langdale KC refers to the cases of Child O and Child P, two of three triplets who died.

For Child O, whom Letby was found guilty of murdering, the baby's death was a shock to staff on the neonatal unit.

Dr Brearey was aware that Letby was involved in the resuscitation. He did not notice “any outwardly suspicious actions” but describes being very worried at this stage and refers to his intention to discuss the matter with Ms Powell and escalate to Executives.

On Friday, June 24, 2016, Ms Rees was called to the office of Ms Karen Townsend, the Director of Urgent Care. Child O had died the previous evening. Ms Rees says that in that meeting she was told that Dr Brearey and Dr Jayaram “both thought that Lucy was purposely harming babies”.

Ms Rees’s evidence is that she proceeded to meet with Dr Jayaram, Dr Brearey, Ms Kelly and Ms Powell on that day. She says Dr Jayaram told her that Letby “may be harming babies” and that Dr Brearey shared these concerns.

 
1:52pm

Ms Rees says that she decided not to exclude Letby from the Neonatal Unit at that stage on Friday as she had been given no detail in support of the concerns by either Dr Brearey or Dr Jayaram She had received substantial reassurance from Ms Powell and had not been instructed to exclude Letby in her conversation with the Director of Nursing and Quality, Ms Kelly.

In her statement to the Inquiry, Ms Kelly says that Ms Rees was “very upset” and that it came as a complete shock to be told that two consultants thought that Letby was intentionally harming babies. Ms Kelly reports that she agreed with Ms Rees that the concerns were very worrying but that there was insufficient basis to remove Letby.

Despite the expression of concerns from the two most senior consultant paediatricians, no decision was made to remove Letby from the unit during the Friday.

1:53pm

At 4pm, Child P deteriorated suddenly and died. Letby was found guilty of his murder.

Dr Brearey telephoned Ms Rees at home requesting that Letby be taken off the ward. This was not done.

After the deaths of two of the triplets, the father of O, P and [R] was so worried that something was going to happen to [baby R] that he requested that [baby R] be taken to Liverpool Women’s Hospital. [R] was taken there. As Mr Baker KC notes in his opening submissions, “Mother OPR and Father OPR believe, justifiably so, that this decision saved the life of [Child R]”.

1:55pm

Ms Langdale KC moves to the case of Child Q.

On June 25, Child Q collapsed unexpectedly. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on the charge of attempted murder.

Ms Kelly has told the Inquiry that she was not told about Child Q’s collapse, despite what she says was agreed in the May meeting. On June 26, Dr Brearey emailed Ms Kelly referring to the “2 mortalities last week” and inviting Ms Kelly and Mr Harvey to a senior paediatricians meeting at noon on Monday 27 June 2016 at which the mortalities would be discussed.

Dr Brearey has stated that he telephoned Mr Harvey after the meeting to inform him that the meeting agreed that Mr Harvey should be asked to remove Letby from the NNU until the cause of the deaths had been adequately investigated.

1:57pm

Every week there was a meeting of the Executive Directors Group, to which all Executive Directors were invited. The records of their meetings suggest there had been no discussions about unexplained instances of infant mortality or of concerns about a rise in the death rate on the neonatal unit prior to June 2016.

That was to change.

The deaths of two of the triplets, Child O and Child P, catapulted the issue of Letby and neonatal mortality to the top of the Executive Team agenda.

Ms Langdale adds: "Whether it should have been there before, will be a matter for you [Lady Justice Thirlwall] to determine in due course."

 
Last edited:
How interesting

Letby visited different children's hospital while deaths were investigatedpublished at 15:44 British Summer Time
15:44 BST​


ee1f1e45-2687-4090-816e-cd3f8b8e263c.jpg.webp
Judith Moritz
Reporting from the inquiry

The inquiry hears that, at the end of January 2017, Letby told director of nursing Alison Kelly she had been speaking to a colleague - referred to as Dr U - at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital in Liverpool about the possibility of an observational placement.

Observational placements allow healthcare professionals to spend time observing others in order to build up their knowledge.

Langdale says that, at the time, Dr U knew the mortality rate on the Countess of Chester’s neonatal unit was being investigated, that Letby had been identified as a common factor in the deaths, and that she had been moved to non-clinical duties.

Dr U reported in his witness statement that Letby attended Alder Hey for a number of supervised visits - observing outpatient work, clinics, ward rounds, and team meetings - but that, to his knowledge, she had “no unsupervised patient contact”.

“Letby attending Alder Hey Children’s Hospital in any capacity during the period she was excluded from the neonatal unit is an area of particular concern for the inquiry,” Langdale says.

She adds it was not until June 2017 that Letby was told she could no longer go to Alder Hey, and that the extent to which Alder Hey were informed about the concerns surrounding Letby needs “to be clearly understood”.
 
"Hi is that alder hey hospital for children? Excellent this is the countess of Chester and I was wondering if we could arrange a ahem special professional arrangement for someone we have here? Good yes. Well you see its a bit of a long story but we have a child killing nurse here who's been running rampant, it's OK though she doesn't look very murdery". Jmo
 
Last edited:

Not sure if this has been posted yet as I haven't gone through all the pages here yet but I watch a lot of this guy's videos (and of his mate the BlackBelt Barrister) and to bring to everyone's attention that our own CS2C gets a very positive mention by him.
 
How interesting

Letby visited different children's hospital while deaths were investigatedpublished at 15:44 British Summer Time​

15:44 BST​


ee1f1e45-2687-4090-816e-cd3f8b8e263c.jpg.webp
Judith Moritz
Reporting from the inquiry

The inquiry hears that, at the end of January 2017, Letby told director of nursing Alison Kelly she had been speaking to a colleague - referred to as Dr U - at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital in Liverpool about the possibility of an observational placement.

Observational placements allow healthcare professionals to spend time observing others in order to build up their knowledge.

Langdale says that, at the time, Dr U knew the mortality rate on the Countess of Chester’s neonatal unit was being investigated, that Letby had been identified as a common factor in the deaths, and that she had been moved to non-clinical duties.

Dr U reported in his witness statement that Letby attended Alder Hey for a number of supervised visits - observing outpatient work, clinics, ward rounds, and team meetings - but that, to his knowledge, she had “no unsupervised patient contact”.

“Letby attending Alder Hey Children’s Hospital in any capacity during the period she was excluded from the neonatal unit is an area of particular concern for the inquiry,” Langdale says.

She adds it was not until June 2017 that Letby was told she could no longer go to Alder Hey, and that the extent to which Alder Hey were informed about the concerns surrounding Letby needs “to be clearly understood”.
Doc Choc was behind her visits to Alder Hey!


Letby exchanged over 1,300 Facebook messages with junior doctor​

14:03 BST​


Judith Moritz
Reporting from the inquiry

We are hearing more now from Rachel Langdale KC as she continues making her opening statement to the inquiry - she begins by talking about the extent to which Letby used to send messages to a paediatric registrar - a junior doctor anonymised as Dr U.

Langdale says over 1,300 Facebook messages were exchanged between Letby and Dr U between mid-June and 28 September 2016.

"Some of these messages discussed the collapses of babies that Letby was involved in. Dr U himself was involved in the care of Child I, Child L, Child M, Child O and Child P.”

Lucy Letby hospital inquiry: Letby visited different children's hospital while deaths were investigated, inquiry told
 
"Hi is that alder hey hospital for children? Excellent this is the countess of Chester and I was wondering if we could arrange a ahem special professional arrangement for someone we have here? Good yes. Well you see its a bit of a long story but we have a child killing nurse here who's been running rampant, it's OK though she doesn't look very murdery". Jmo

Well it's no what you know it's who you know ..as they say.
I can imagine the "Dr Colleague" who arranged the visits for her knowing full well she was off clinical duties will have lots of questions to answer
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
143
Guests online
266
Total visitors
409

Forum statistics

Threads
609,516
Messages
18,255,189
Members
234,678
Latest member
NavyGirl75
Back
Top