Found Deceased UK - Natasha Reddington-Romanov, 55, last seen leaving a night out in Soho, 20 Sep 2024

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
“Two of the bartenders from Trisha’s, who are close friends of ours, were waiting to get into the club, but there was quite a long line,” Kawalik said. “Natasha walked past and didn’t go into the club.”
RSBM

I think there is something about this statement which could signify this was unusual for her. Walking past close friends. JMO
 
Natasha Reddington-Romanov, 55, was last seen on September 20 and the Metropolitan Police said her body was found in the River Thames near Vauxhall Bridge today.

The Southwark resident's death is 'being treated as unexpected, but not suspicious', the force added, after friends feared she might have been targeted as a transgender woman.

To go home from Tricia’s in Soho, she would have taken the Golden Jubilee Bridge and go straight 1h walking to Old Kent rd.
Instead, she was found near the Vauxhall Bridge further down. So either the water brought her there, or ?
I would think that at that time of night, you just take the straight route

Straight route home via Golden Jubilee Bridge
1727601217068.jpeg

Via Vauxhall Bridge
1727601278319.jpeg

I suppose we will never know…
 
How is it not suspicious? It seems to me she was walking home and then she was drowned in the river. Unless she was extremely intoxicated, which doesn’t seem to be the case from witness statements, I would think her death is suspicious. It at least seems quite early to say one way or another. MOO
Why would it be suspicious? She may be trans but I don't think that changes the fact that when an intoxicated man goes missing he's usually found in water nearby. I'm not being rude or mean so please Noone take it that way. I'm just trying to understand why it's different for this situation, any other time our mind goes straight to "they're in the water". MOO
 
Why would it be suspicious? She may be trans but I don't think that changes the fact that when an intoxicated man goes missing he's usually found in water nearby. I'm not being rude or mean so please Noone take it that way. I'm just trying to understand why it's different for this situation, any other time our mind goes straight to "they're in the water". MOO
I just thought it seemed a rush to judgment when they automatically said it wasn’t suspicious. I was hoping they didn’t just write it off as a suicide or misadventure due to the circumstances. I would’ve felt it a quick announcement whether the person was trans or not. MOO
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
119
Guests online
1,630
Total visitors
1,749

Forum statistics

Threads
605,470
Messages
18,187,394
Members
233,382
Latest member
Ma1love
Back
Top