Last edited by a moderator:
I've thought about that note overnight and am struck by how many people have just assumed she wrote it in anguish or despair, because that's what the defence have said or they relate it to personal circumstances.
No one know what state of mind she was in. Like John Worboys, she could have been plotting out her excuses for WHY she killed them because:
Writing on a post it note with doodles of a cat shows me she wasn't that anguished. Because you have to really concentrate on getting everything into a teeny tiny post tit. When you're anguished, it's not easy to focus in that way. Also the pen pressure looks different so it looks like it was written at different times. Why return to the same note unless she was just updating her ideas and wanted it in one place. She was methodical, we know this from how she writes down everything, so it makes sense that she wanted everything on one post it if they were all linked thoughts - all linked to her defence excuses.
- (Remorseful defence) on purpose, I am evil
- (Self pitying defence) because i'm not good enough to care for them, I will never have kids/marry
- (Indignant defence) I haven't done anything wrong
- (Blame defence) Police victimisation, slander, discrimination
- Feelings to demonstrate to police depending on which defence is used - I can't breathe (Remorseful), I don't deserve to live or deserve mum and dad etc (Self pitying), Why me (indignant), panic/fear (blame)
I''m very curious to see what other notes they found at her home.
I do feel she has a more calculating air about her because she messaged people to say she was bored, unfulfilled, days were slow - just after babies had died on her watch! Then got defensive (as per messages) when she was being questioned by a senior consultant - surely you'd expect to be questioned if you've been present at all the unexplained incidents.
Also the very methodical notes on understanding who made allegations and what was the evidence. She didn't crack at interview and knew how to evade questions even in 2020. She strikes me as someone calm, collected and analytical not hysterical.
MOO.
IMO it is just tactics by the defence to ‘discredit’ the independent expert witness and try and introduce an element of doubt RE accuracy of his testimonial/expert advice.I wonder what the defence is trying to say.
Do they mean Dr Evans’ knowledge is out of date and isn’t familiar with the new machines/monitors.
Is there anything so unique about the new machines?
Biology hasn’t changed since he stopped practice so I’m not sure what they want to say regarding his knowledge being out of date.
Exactly, but the defence have to try and pull him apart somehow. I’m sure the jury are aware of defence lawyers tactics and hopefully aren’t falling for it.I wonder what the defence is trying to say.
Do they mean Dr Evans’ knowledge is out of date and isn’t familiar with the new machines/monitors.
Is there anything so unique about the new machines?
Biology hasn’t changed since he stopped practice so I’m not sure what they want to say regarding his knowledge being out of date.
A pair to be reckoned with!Pictures of two of the prosecution's expert witnesses in the DM
Dr Dewi Evans and Dr Sandie Bohin
View attachment 373218
View attachment 373219
Pediatrician Dr Sandie Bohin and fellow expert witness Dr Dewi Evans arrive at Manchester Crown Court for Day 4 of Letby's trial
Lucy Letby 'wrote Post-It note declaring: I AM EVIL. I DID THIS'
That’s exactly what it is. If I’m reading it correct Dr. Evans said that he wasn’t familiar with the brand Phillips (he used a Hewlett-Packard) not that he wasn’t familiar with what the machine actually does.IMO it is just tactics by the defence to ‘discredit’ the independent expert witness and try and introduce an element of doubt RE accuracy of his testimonial/expert advice.
And a heck of a lot of time.One has to have nerves of steel to follow this trial.