Parker Knoll
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2020
- Messages
- 1,293
- Reaction score
- 10,289
I see KDB giving evidence next week but apart from her I can’t see any of the nurses listed for the 10th wanting her anywhere near that unit.
I don't know why I didn't think of this before, but I wonder if they re-prosecuted baby K's case because of the method she deployed of dislodging her breathing tube. It would then be a similar fact case if they decide to bring further charges for the many instances of dislodged breathing tubes on LL's shifts.
MOO
Thanks Mary. If you don't mind I'll copy that over to our Inquiry discussion thread so we have it there too.Dear God. I need a drink.
Lucy Letby encouraged by manager to visit Alder Hey children’s hospital, inquiry hears
Countess of Chester senior nurse said placements would give Letby ‘break’ from stress, despite knowing she was under investigation over babies’ deathswww.theguardian.com
Dear God. I need a drink.
Lucy Letby encouraged by manager to visit Alder Hey children’s hospital, inquiry hears
Countess of Chester senior nurse said placements would give Letby ‘break’ from stress, despite knowing she was under investigation over babies’ deathswww.theguardian.com
It's extraordinary. Gobsmackingly so. As is so much of what's emerged in this Inquiry.
I know. And I thought it might be a little dry & dull. That's showing me!
It is action packed!
And I mean that in the best and most meaningful way, that it's righting all the ignorant wrongs that were allowed to circulate so freely and so unchallenged post verdict.
Thank goodness it didn't work on the jury.The problem with sociopaths who 'pass' in society is that they are very often charismatic, charming, and highly manipulative. Letby used that with precision. With multiple people, her approach seems to have been to play weak, sweet, fragile, and prey on her collegues' natural urge to help her.
This is in contrast with what else we know of her arrogance, her superiority, and her tendency to drop friends who didn't respond to her need for narcissistic supply.
The ones who could be manipulated by playing shy and weak seem to have been very strongly hypnotised by her. Doc Choc is most obvious, but also the whole array of supervisors and hospital execs who were willing against all evidence to fight for her to be returned to her hunting ground. She seems to have specialised in getting those people to break protocol for her. To email her and feed her information. To get her into wards and line up jobs for her when she was suspected of harming dozens of vulnerable infants. To censor reports of the risk she posed in the hospital environment.
She's like a killdeer, limping along with her 'broken' wing while she leads people around in circles, further and further from the truth. And she enjoyed that just as much as the killing.
I think she's one of the most extreme sadists I've ever read about. Stephen Norton of Christie's Poirot doesn't have a patch on her.
MOO
This is beyond appalling. To me it's the same horror as in the UK when they used to (still do?) send Paedophiles miles away from their victims after prison but often send them to the seaside and be allowed outside all day long. Edited to add: JMOIt's extraordinary. Gobsmackingly so. As is so much of what's emerged in this Inquiry.
Nothing new. Only that he thinks he shared too much with her, maybe was manipulated into sharing info.Behind a paywall that I can't see. Can anyone else see the contents? Truth about Lucy Letby and the married doctor she 'loved'
If you're joining this late, having missed her ten month trial last year, and her retrial on one of the charges this year, I think the Court of Appeal judgement would be a good place to start, as it provides a really comprehensive background to the case -I am wondering anyone has here has heard of a case in Canada in the early ‘80’s. A nurse was accused of killing babies but the charges would eventually be dropped.
Here is the link https://macleans.ca/culture/books/baby-killer-turns-out-to-be-rubber/
I’ve just begun reading about Letby. I’m struggling to understand the case and the Canadian case gives me pause Could there be another explanation that has been missed?