Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is iffy evidence though cos the testimony was from a friend of JI's saying JI had seen "a man" and "a woman" arguing.
Maybe JI will testify later on to clarify
Yes but what is the problem with that? It's her house. She lives there..fair enough if he didn't want his boss to put 2+2 together about him living there (although I doubt the boss would be that interested,after all he was paying him cash I'm hand)
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
Maybe the police showed JI a picture of SH and he confirmed it was her.
That he didnt want his boss to know he was ordering a take away when he was supposed to be working? She says he normally worked evening but doesn't mention why he wasn't working that evening. I'm wondering just how good those take aways must be if they went to that trouble to get one instead of just getting something else ,lol
He told the police that he'd quit his job on the 18th.
Tom Parmenter Verified account  ‏@TomSkyNews · 48s49 seconds ago
QC You and Nathan were in this together from start to finish
SH "No"
Is this normal for prosecution line of questioning? All feels a bit tame to me, I mean she's hardly going to say "yes", is she??!
I just have the urge to stamp the word B U L L S H I T in massive letters across this whole page.
OK, so court has finished for the day.
At this stage of play, does anyone believe what SH says, that she's entirely innocent of everything?
Is this normal for prosecution line of questioning? All feels a bit tame to me, I mean she's hardly going to say "yes", is she??!