Court 1 T20177023ROBERT HENRY TRIGG
Trial (Part Heard) - Summing Up - 11:45
http://xhibit.justice.gov.uk/lewes.htm
Another of his partners, Susan Holland, died in February this year, Lewes Crown Court heard.
Trigg had been cautioned for assaulting her in 2003 after he accused her of an affair and called the police, saying: Im going to kill her. You need to arrest me.
Yesterday Ms Howes said: She too was found dead in her home. There still needed to be a post mortem to establish her death. It was natural causes.
I dont mean to make light of this but I expect Robert Trigg was rather grateful he was in custody at the time.
As she summed up the defence case, Ms Howes asked jurors when reaching their verdict to question the reliability of witness evidence and consider if Triggs actions after the deaths could be explained by the effects of shock.
She suggested an account from neighbour Hannah Cooper who told the court Ms Nicholson and Trigg had a volatile and violent relationship with alcohol-fuelled rows and numerous calls to police - had been embellished for reasons probably understandable, adding: That is the danger of well-meaning neighbours who are now aware there are two allegations rather than one.
She said she did not seek to minimise or trivialise abusive behaviour but it related to a small number of incidents over a lengthy period of time, claiming police had done their very best to dig up any bad character references.
She asked: Does that really show a man who is a possessive, dangerous predator to women?
http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/15390046.Third_partner_of_accused_died/
She [defence QC] said: We should all be grateful we live in a country where the burden of proof is on the prosecution.
She pointed out Trigg answered police questions at the time of the two deaths, and gave evidence at the inquest into the death of Miss Nicholson.
The defence added: The causes of death are quite different and we are not dealing with a pattern of killing where the killer left a hallmark.
The jury was told former chef Trigg had a history of violence against previous partners in a bad character application.
Referring to the application, the defence said: Does that really show a man who is a jealous, controlling, possessive, dangerous man predatory to women, who when he doesnt get what he wants turns to punching?
Or does this signal to the background of alcohol abuse? Where is the evidence of jealous, controlling and possessive behaviour?
Or is it a more evidence of a drunken slob? She said examples of bad character were a small amount of incidents over a lengthy period of time.
In her closing statement she said: The sudden and unexpected death of Caroline Devlin and Susan Nicholson was tragic for them and terrible for the families.
But nothing will bring them back. It is time to draw the line and put these matters to rest.
Read more at: http://www.wscountytimes.co.uk/news...two-girlfriends-awaits-jury-verdict-1-8040029
I'm sure this is the right verdict. I hope they publish the sentencing remarks which may fill in the gaps a bit.
I really didn't like some of the Defence QC's closing speech yesterday. That would have rubbed me up the wrong way if I was on the jury.