UK UK - Shelley Morgan, 34, stabbed, (Former Iowan), Bristol, 11 June 1984

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Media reports do state that Melanie Road was raped - for example, here from the Bristol Post.

Nonetheless, while cases do seem extraordinarily similar, the fact that police don’t seem to have linked them suggests that something doesn’t quite match.
Melanie Road was raped twice by Hampton. The police originally suspected two offenders because there were two semen samples.

There are a lot of similarities between the Road and Morgan murders. The Home Office pathologist suspected they were both committed by the same man.
 
296,307 views Aug 24, 2018
Crimewatch UK 1984 The 11 Murders that had full reconstructions during 1984 Thank you to Redcard74 for the original uploads Colette Aram (Solved) Caroline Osborne (Solved) Christopher Laverack (Solved But No Conviction) Gary Collins (Unsolved) Janice Weston (Unsolved) Stephen Sylvester and Hardeep Sangha (Both Unsolved) Shelley Morgan (Unsolved) Lloyd Simpson (Unsolved) John Speed (Solved) Yvonne Coley (Unsolved)
 
The murders the police looked at Hampton for are Shelley Morgan, Jackie Waines and Helen Fleet.

Hampton also committed a sexual assault in 1973, which went unreported.
Welcome to Ws @tes1984!
Ws threads for the other women referenced in your post..

 
Media reports do state that Melanie Road was raped - for example, here from the Bristol Post.

Nonetheless, while cases do seem extraordinarily similar, the fact that police don’t seem to have linked them suggests that something doesn’t quite match.

Melanie Road was raped twice by Hampton. The police originally suspected two offenders because there were two semen samples.

There are a lot of similarities between the Road and Morgan murders. The Home Office pathologist suspected they were both committed by the same man.

Not sure about the accuracy of the media reporting that Hampton had been charged with the rape and murder of Melanie, because the only charge he faced in court was for her murder.

Justice Popplewell in his summing up made reference that Hampton "sexually abused" Melanie, but no mention of raping her.

 

Talking about Christopher Hampton who murdered Melanie Road, and is convinced he also murdered Shelley.

Unless new information had been forthcoming, her view in that article contradicts her very strong beliefs back in 2016 that:

"Apart from that there is nothing to suggest that Christopher Hampton is responsible for that murder or for any other murder locally or nationally." - "that murder" being Melanie Hall, not Road.

 
A few months back I spent some time collating all the information that has been officially released on the case, and produced a website to have all the information in one place. I've now seen the site has been shared by someone on another site, so if anyone on here is interested:


It's nothing special and probably shows I should have paid more attention in my English language and literature classes at school with my use of words. I've enhanced some photos with AI, and added some misc bits of info about location/map.

I was unaware until pulling the information together that the police had provided the serial number of the lense attached to the OM20 - the late evening Crimewatch Update programme of 6 November 1984 following a call from a viewer. To the best of my knowledge the lense serial number has never been mentioned since, despite the camera and lense can be separated and sold accordingly.

Away from the above, on the subject of the two postcards, just to add that the photos were taken by two individuals - one male/Clifton and one female/Backwell (LRPS accredited). I know both names, and they died some years back.
Great work creating the website.
Do you have any more information about the camera lens?

Unfortunately I do not have any more information to add about the lens.
 
Yes that's strange, I'm not sure why he wasn't charged with rape as well as murder.

Julie Mackay was the officer who arrested Hampton, and mentions in her book that the police originally suspected a pair of offenders, possibly brothers, due to the semen evidence (obviously this was before they could test the semen samples for DNA).

I wonder if Hampton could have agreed to plead guilty to murder, as long as he wasn't charged with rape or sexual assault.
 
Unless new information had been forthcoming, her view in that article contradicts her very strong beliefs back in 2016 that:

"Apart from that there is nothing to suggest that Christopher Hampton is responsible for that murder or for any other murder locally or nationally." - "that murder" being Melanie Hall, not Road.

Perhaps she was working from memory at times when she wrote her book. She could have misremembered a few things.

There are a couple of things in the book which don't quite seem to make sense.
 
There were hundreds of rapes and sexual assaults in Bristol during the mid 80s. Thankfully there weren't many murders though.
By Evie Coffey 24 JAN 2023
''A man from Bristol has been jailed for a series of sexual assaults during the 1980s and 1990s. Leroy Hall, of Chaplin Road in Easton, was jailed at Bristol Crown Court on Friday, January 20, after being found guilty of crimes he committed.

A five-day trial heard that during the late 1980s, a girl, who was 17 at the time, climbed into Hall's car before he drove the victim to the Eastville neighbourhood of the city and raped her. When she saw a newspaper article with a picture of Hall, she recognised him as the man who had sexually assaulted her, and she reported what had happened to police in 2017.
1698178814107.png
''He also committed further crimes against a second person in the mid-1990s, with Hall being found guilty on one count of false imprisonment and one of indecent assault. Hall offered the woman, who was in her 20s at the time, a ride in Stoke Croft, but instead of taking her where she wanted to go, he drove her about Bristol before indecently assaulting her.''
 
By Evie Coffey 24 JAN 2023
''A man from Bristol has been jailed for a series of sexual assaults during the 1980s and 1990s. Leroy Hall, of Chaplin Road in Easton, was jailed at Bristol Crown Court on Friday, January 20, after being found guilty of crimes he committed.

A five-day trial heard that during the late 1980s, a girl, who was 17 at the time, climbed into Hall's car before he drove the victim to the Eastville neighbourhood of the city and raped her. When she saw a newspaper article with a picture of Hall, she recognised him as the man who had sexually assaulted her, and she reported what had happened to police in 2017.
View attachment 455596
''He also committed further crimes against a second person in the mid-1990s, with Hall being found guilty on one count of false imprisonment and one of indecent assault. Hall offered the woman, who was in her 20s at the time, a ride in Stoke Croft, but instead of taking her where she wanted to go, he drove her about Bristol before indecently assaulting her.''
He's a very interesting suspect although as far as I know he wasn't driving cabs yet, or linked to Backwell in 1984.

During the 80s and 90s, there were many men around the St Paul's area of Bristol who were committing abduction offences. It was one of the most dangerous areas in the UK and was full of pimps, convicted sex offenders, drug dealers and illegal cab drivers.
 
If Bower Ashton is a beauty spot, why did it take 4 months to find her remains?

With regards to the anonymous caller, i guess he was a loner and noone recognised his voice
Her remains were found in a fairly isolated spot near Backwell. On private land, off a quiet road, and not the sort of place people would really spend time at.
 
Thought I would add some information following research about the OM20 in general, and some further details that may be of interest.

As most will know the OM20 was produced from 1983 to 1987, and that the OM20 was sold as the OMG20 in America.

Going into a bit more detail, the OM20 chrome version was first to enter the UK market before the European market. The OM20 black version was produced for the Japanese market.

Olympus used the same serial number series for their OM range of cameras OM1, OM10, OM20 etc, therefore whilst Shelley's OM20 was serial number 1032853, there was not another million+ OM20 cameras produced before Shelley's.

The Olympus OM serial numbers are on replaceable/interchangeable base plates. Therefore there is nothing to stop anyone swapping base plates within a specific OM camera range so that a camera body could lose its original identity.

So if an OM20 serial number 1032853 is found, how do you know that it is the original complete camera (base plate + body) ? It might be the 1032853 base plate has been added to another OM20 body, and also opens up the possibilty that Shelley's OM20 camera body might be circulating with a different serial number.

Prior to doing the website mentioned in post #74 above, I spent time looking for the Olympus OM20 online. Whilst not time consuming (perhaps 15 - 30 minutes per day) once you complete a back search since the internet began to bring you up to current day's postings online, it was repetitive and mind numbing, but perhaps the thought of maybe, just maybe, that the next camera viewed would be the elusive 1032853 meant I ended up searching for just over 2 years.

Of the 1887 web pages I visited, I managed to obtain 1235 complete or partial (number sequencing did not match 1032853) serial numbers either from the web page or by contacting the OM20 seller either directly or indirectly. At no time did I tell the seller what serial number I was looking for or mention the Shelley Morgan case, just that I was looking for an early production OM20 and could the seller tell me the number of their OM20.

The issue about the serial number base plate and potential to replace/interchange them was borne out when an OM20 base plate was for sale separately by one seller, and a few weeks later it appeared on an OM20 camera being sold by another seller. The seller of the camera told me he had to replace the original base plate because it had been dented.

Only one seller said to me about the Shelley Morgan case because they had read about it, and at no point did anyone say that I was not the first person to enquire about the serial number of their OM20 - which is why after two years I decided to stop searching online. I came to the conclusion, rightly or wrongly, that if someone else (police) are not undertaking a similar search then perhaps they have their focus on the camera being somewhere more specific.

Whilst the OM20 chrome was sold to the UK and European camera markets, now they can be found anywhere in the world. As an example one originally sold back in the 1980s fairly locally to Bristol in Swindon was for sale in Canada.

A couple of downsides to the search:

- An Italian OM20 seller who thought I was a Nigerian scammer thanks to poor transation by Google Translate tool.

- A gentleman's disturbed and complicated life. Of East European parentage, him and his siblings were sent away for several years to a residential childrens home in the north of England. He had a passion for painting at school.

By the age of 15 he had become a father and went onto have according to my research a total of 5 children by 4 different women - so he had an unstable childhood and understable adulthood. At some point in his childhood he changed his surname. He had an ego and liked chatting up the ladies, but also had a short temper even towards women. He died from ill health, but had mental health issues too. He was into amateur photography.

A daughter was selling his OM20 following his death the previous year, and if she had provided the serial number sooner I would not have even thought about looking into his background, but the delay in providing the serial number got me suspicious because it was Bristol, so it made me research him online through some Government records plus it was still possible to access his Facebook account as it was still live and public. I was unable to prove his actual place of birth, but had given it as Bristol on a profile.

Obviously the serial number was not the one, but his original birth surname is one that has a family reputation in Bristol for crime - he himself had appeared in court on at least one occassion, albeit for a motoring offence.

Unfortunately he seemed to live largely under the radar, with little information officially recorded under the UK's Birth, Marriages and Deaths records, but he posted about his life on FB.

If anyone has read books about psychology of murderers you will probably understand why this gentleman is interesting.

The search did turn up some stories, albeit irrelevant:

- One British gentleman had his then new OM20 stolen in Malaysia. At the time an OM20 chrome in Asia would have been extremely rare.

- Another gentleman had received a bag of cameras including an OM20 from an east of England police force. The gentleman, who was a child at the time, was with his father whan an officer took the soaking wet bag of water soiled cameras out the boot of the police car and gave it too them. Neither gentleman can remember the exact reason for the officer handing them the cameras, but the OM20 was the only one to survive and they restored it.
 
Her remains were found in a fairly isolated spot near Backwell. On private land, off a quiet road, and not the sort of place people would really spend time at.

You raise an important point about the location and this is something I had been meaning to bring up. Shelley's body was found in a copse within a field.

Looking at historical satellite images dating back as far as possible to the current day, that field has always been used to grow hay or silage, so in the month of June the grass would have been knee height or more perhaps. To get to the copse you would have either had to walk through the grass or walk around the outside of the field. I suppose you could drive through the field to the copse, but a farmer managing the land would have noticed the flattened grass at any point.

By the time Shelley's body was found in October, the field had been harvested as can be seen from the images from the police search - the grass had been cut. Any potential evidence in the grass may have been shredded by farm machinery during harvesting.
 
Last edited:
Thought I would add some information following research about the OM20 in general, and some further details that may be of interest.

As most will know the OM20 was produced from 1983 to 1987, and that the OM20 was sold as the OMG20 in America.

Going into a bit more detail, the OM20 chrome version was first to enter the UK market before the European market. The OM20 black version was produced for the Japanese market.

Olympus used the same serial number series for their OM range of cameras OM1, OM10, OM20 etc, therefore whilst Shelley's OM20 was serial number 1032853, there was not another million+ OM20 cameras produced before Shelley's.

The Olympus OM serial numbers are on replaceable/interchangeable base plates. Therefore there is nothing to stop anyone swapping base plates within a specific OM camera range so that a camera body could lose its original identity.

So if an OM20 serial number 1032853 is found, how do you know that it is the original complete camera (base plate + body) ? It might be the 1032853 base plate has been added to another OM20 body, and also opens up the possibilty that Shelley's OM20 camera body might be circulating with a different serial number.

Prior to doing the website mentioned in post #74 above, I spent time looking for the Olympus OM20 online. Whilst not time consuming (perhaps 15 - 30 minutes per day) once you complete a back search since the internet began to bring you up to current day's postings online, it was repetitive and mind numbing, but perhaps the thought of maybe, just maybe, that the next camera viewed would be the elusive 1032853 meant I ended up searching for just over 2 years.

Of the 1887 web pages I visited, I managed to obtain 1235 complete or partial (number sequencing did not match 1032853) serial numbers either from the web page or by contacting the OM20 seller either directly or indirectly. At no time did I tell the seller what serial number I was looking for or mention the Shelley Morgan case, just that I was looking for an early production OM20 and could the seller tell me the number of their OM20.

The issue about the serial number base plate and potential to replace/interchange them was borne out when an OM20 base plate was for sale separately by one seller, and a few weeks later it appeared on an OM20 camera being sold by another seller. The seller of the camera told me he had to replace the original base plate because it had been dented.

Only one seller said to me about the Shelley Morgan case because they had read about it, and at no point did anyone say that I was not the first person to enquire about the serial number of their OM20 - which is why after two years I decided to stop searching online. I came to the conclusion, rightly or wrongly, that if someone else (police) are not undertaking a similar search then perhaps they have their focus on the camera being somewhere more specific.

Whilst the OM20 chrome was sold to the UK and European camera markets, now they can be found anywhere in the world. As an example one originally sold back in the 1980s fairly locally to Bristol in Swindon was for sale in Canada.

A couple of downsides to the search:

- An Italian OM20 seller who thought I was a Nigerian scammer thanks to poor transation by Google Translate tool.

- A gentleman's disturbed and complicated life. Of East European parentage, him and his siblings were sent away for several years to a residential childrens home in the north of England. He had a passion for painting at school.

By the age of 15 he had become a father and went onto have according to my research a total of 5 children by 4 different women - so he had an unstable childhood and understable adulthood. At some point in his childhood he changed his surname. He had an ego and liked chatting up the ladies, but also had a short temper even towards women. He died from ill health, but had mental health issues too. He was into amateur photography.

A daughter was selling his OM20 following his death the previous year, and if she had provided the serial number sooner I would not have even thought about looking into his background, but the delay in providing the serial number got me suspicious because it was Bristol, so it made me research him online through some Government records plus it was still possible to access his Facebook account as it was still live and public. I was unable to prove his actual place of birth, but had given it as Bristol on a profile.

Obviously the serial number was not the one, but his original birth surname is one that has a family reputation in Bristol for crime - he himself had appeared in court on at least one occassion, albeit for a motoring offence.

Unfortunately he seemed to live largely under the radar, with little information officially recorded under the UK's Birth, Marriages and Deaths records, but he posted about his life on FB.

If anyone has read books about psychology of murderers you will probably understand why this gentleman is interesting.

The search did turn up some stories, albeit irrelevant:

- One British gentleman had his then new OM20 stolen in Malaysia. At the time an OM20 chrome in Asia would have been extremely rare.

- Another gentleman had received a bag of cameras including an OM20 from an east of England police force. The gentleman, who was a child at the time, was with his father whan an officer took the soaking wet bag of water soiled cameras out the boot of the police car and gave it too them. Neither gentleman can remember the exact reason for the officer handing them the cameras, but the OM20 was the only one to survive and they restored it.
Awesome info and research, thank you!
 
A gentleman's disturbed and complicated life. Of East European parentage, him and his siblings were sent away for several years to a residential childrens home in the north of England. He had a passion for painting at school.

By the age of 15 he had become a father and went onto have according to my research a total of 5 children by 4 different women - so he had an unstable childhood and understable adulthood. At some point in his childhood he changed his surname. He had an ego and liked chatting up the ladies, but also had a short temper even towards women. He died from ill health, but had mental health issues too. He was into amateur photography.

A daughter was selling his OM20 following his death the previous year, and if she had provided the serial number sooner I would not have even thought about looking into his background, but the delay in providing the serial number got me suspicious because it was Bristol, so it made me research him online through some Government records plus it was still possible to access his Facebook account as it was still live and public. I was unable to prove his actual place of birth, but had given it as Bristol on a profile.

Obviously the serial number was not the one, but his original birth surname is one that has a family reputation in Bristol for crime - he himself had appeared in court on at least one occassion, albeit for a motoring offence.

Unfortunately he seemed to live largely under the radar, with little information officially recorded under the UK's Birth, Marriages and Deaths records, but he posted about his life on FB.

If anyone has read books about psychology of murderers you will probably understand why this gentleman is interesting.
That's fantastic research and a brilliant effort.
I might be wrong, but suspect I might know the family you are discussing. Very strange that he would change his name at such a young age.
Did the daughter provide the serial number in the end?
 
You raise an important point about the location and this is something I had been meaning to bring up. Shelley's body was found in a copse within a field.

Looking at historical satellite images dating back as far as possible to the current day, that field has always been used to grow hay or silage, so in the month of June the grass would have been knee height or more perhaps. To get to the copse you would have either had to walk through the grass or walk around the outside of the field. I suppose you could drive through the field to the copse, but a farmer managing the land would have noticed the flattened grass at any point.

By the time Shelley's body was found in October, the field had been harvested as can be seen from the images from the police search - the grass had been cut. Any potential evidence in the grass may have been shredded by farm machinery during harvesting.
Great point about the length of the grass. It's not the most obvious spot for a killer who is unfamiliar with the area to take a victim to (or to carry a body to).

Do you think Shelley was killed at the copse? I suspect she was because otherwise the killer has to carry her a fair distance through unfamiliar terrain, and also there's no obvious reason for Shelley's sandals to be there if she was killed somewhere else.
 
Not sure about the accuracy of the media reporting that Hampton had been charged with the rape and murder of Melanie, because the only charge he faced in court was for her murder.

Justice Popplewell in his summing up made reference that Hampton "sexually abused" Melanie, but no mention of raping her.

I think you're right about this. Early on the police mention "some sexual contact" but it's true that Hampton is never arrested for, or charged with, rape.

It's very strange that Melanie was stripped and then redressed if no rape or attempted rape took place. Her underwear is also found in the opposite direction to the one the bloodied Hampton flees in, and her keys are found on a wall, which suggests staging of the crime scene.

It's not been revealed if Melanie was fatally stabbed through her clothes, or if Hampton forced her to strip before killing her. Either way it's all absolutely horrific and a train wreck of a crime in scene in terms of working out what actually happened.
 
That's fantastic research and a brilliant effort.
I might be wrong, but suspect I might know the family you are discussing. Very strange that he would change his name at such a young age.
Did the daughter provide the serial number in the end?
My basis that he changed his surname when young was that his new surname was against the birth records for his first born at 15.

Your comment has made me go back and check UK rules for registering births this morning - it looks like a birth cerificate can be re-issued only once at a later date (have to re-register the birth) to add a father's name where there was no father's name present on the original birth certificate - so if the father's name space was left blank on the original birth certificate, there is always the possibility that he could have changed his name later in life, re-registered the birth to add his name as father (new surname) and a new certicate issued. Not sure what the probability of this happening would be ?

Just to add on the surname, at least one of his siblings has retained the original birth surname, so the change in surname was not done generically across his family, or at least his siblings.

The daughter did eventually provide the serial number, probably 1 - 2 weeks after first contact and after a couple of prompts.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
107
Guests online
194
Total visitors
301

Forum statistics

Threads
608,629
Messages
18,242,649
Members
234,401
Latest member
CRIM1959
Back
Top