Hello Cammy I am kind of new here, but I am here for this trial too! I really can't wait! :seeya:
:seeya: Lynx
Been reading here most of the afternoon + catching up at WRAL.
I just don't know what to think, several things just bother me.
Hello Cammy I am kind of new here, but I am here for this trial too! I really can't wait! :seeya:
:seeya: Lynx
Been reading here most of the afternoon + catching up at WRAL.
I just don't know what to think, several things just bother me.
:seeya:
New to the board but ready for the trial!!
Hello Cammy I am kind of new here, but I am here for this trial too! I really can't wait! :seeya:
Glad to have both you and Cammy join us!
I have been reading some of the search warrants... very interesting case.
I am puzzled as to how the last Jury could not reach a verdict, but I do see
some areas that could have caused problems, like the lady at the gas station,
for instance.
IMO
You realize the Fisher's only asked for visitation, right?
Why would he fight that request?
Actually, that could have been done for far less than $5000.
Yep, as a total shock to the Fisher's, Jay offered up primary custody to Meredith.
Why?
Nothing to do with money, as he said on the stand.
It was because he could not open his mouth in a deposition and incriminate himself.
The easy way for all that to go away was to give up his daughter.
The clerk seemed somewhat confused. IIRC, some of those purchases made by other customers around the same time that Jason Young allegedly purchased his gas. Some of these if my memory servers me correctly were purchased with bank/credit cards, why were these witnesses never sought out? Or were they?
I remember a banned poster from another board that had a problem with the lady at the gas station :laugh:
Personally, I think Gracie was extremely credible.
You realize the Fisher's only asked for visitation, right?
Why would he fight that request?
Actually, that could have been done for far less than $5000.
Yep, as a total shock to the Fisher's, Jay offered up primary custody to Meredith.
Why?
Nothing to do with money, as he said on the stand.
It was because he could not open his mouth in a deposition and incriminate himself.
The easy way for all that to go away was to give up his daughter.
There are an awful lot of people that have problems with the gas attendant testifying that the person she thought was Jason was only 5' tall.
Good question..
Yes, she seemed very confused but having to testify is not the easiest thing in the world.
I am willing to see how she does this time around and if the state can do a better job with her.
IMO
I would like to know if any testimony from the first trial can be re-entered in the second trial. For example, can Jason's testimony be entered? If the gas attendant were to change her testimony, can her testimony from the first trial be entered into evidence?
That IS quite a discrepancy , Otto.
IMO
I don't think we'll ever know what was discussed behind closed doors regarding the custody of the child. If it was only straight forward visitation, the affidavits would not have needed to specify all of Jason's bad behavior at drunken parties. The paperwork should have been a straight forward application for visitation based on it being in the best interests of the child to maintain a relationship with her mother's relatives. The affidavits seemed aimed at painting Jason as an unfit parent. Regardless of what actually happened during those closed door legal discussions, Jason made a decision to have his daughter raised by her mother's sister. It is also possible that Jason actually thought this may be best for his daughter. It seems to me that Jason's comments regarding his sister in law were always positive.
Regarding legal costs ... lawyers are about $500/hr. After 10 hours, $5000 is gone. I have never heard of a contested child custody dispute being solved for $5000, but maybe that's how it works in NC.
I would like to know if any testimony from the first trial can be re-entered in the second trial. For example, can Jason's testimony be entered? If the gas attendant were to change her testimony, can her testimony from the first trial be entered into evidence?
Apparently investigators stopped at gas stations along the supposed route and asked if anyone recognized Jason. One woman with some questionable background claimed she recognized him. When asked to describe him, she said that he was the same height as she. She is 5' tall. Many people watching the trial feed assumed that she must have been standing on something to make that statement, but she was standing on the same floor that Jason was standing on. She should have been able to state that he was head and shoulders taller. What she recalled was that she had an altercation with someone and that he then tipped her $5. It couldn't have been Jason if that person was 5' tall ... simply impossible.
For police to try to slide that one by the jury is like them trying to slide the 3 allele DNA match by the jury. They're presenting information, but it isn't evidence of guilt.