I would be more in favor of a law that allowed the "pantsing" of anyone with the low riders. I'm sure that pants slightly inclined to show some bun cleavage when selecting brie at Von's would not fall to the knees upon a pantsing whereas the baggy britches that somehow defy gravity and hang below the bunnage I believe would be the easy target. It would be so much more fun that way and we would avoid the red tape that is going into issuing all these fines or sentences or whatever.
It would be the test: if a good tug can't pull them all the way down, then they are legal. If we couldn't see a plumber's crack and laugh, what would we have to love about plumbers? (oh yeah, they do make the toilet work again).
If you got pantsed and they fell down, you would just have to live with that...no harm, no foul.
This could become my one serious goal in life because the urge I feel to pants some dude with those belted pants with the waistband around the upper thighs and the boxers in view is almost overwhelming!! I just KNOW those pants would be a pile around the ankles. Then I'd RUN because they aren't going to catch me with pants around their ankles. Problem is I would get capped, pretty sure so I've managed to show restraint
I used to be a famous pantser back in the 80's when those hideous baggy gym pants were in style, what were they called? I'd be arrested nowdays. Ahh the good ole days.