This is probably unlikely based on the distance, but thought I'd throw out that she looks similar to Cindy King. Especially with CarlK's reconstruction. Her jaw line is very pronounced just like the UID's...
Cindy King: case info 1640DFOR on DoeNetwork
I've been looking really close at Cindy King in comparison to this Doe.
As I previously mentioned, the skull is missing the #7, #9 and #10 teeth
postmortem:
Cindy's #7 is crowded behind her #6 and #8, and the Jane Doe's #7 is one of those that I added into the facial reconstruction to complete the image.
In my recon, I depicted these three teeth in alignment based only on the sockets appearing to be in alignment. But I readily admit that that might be a faulty assumption - particularly because you can't really see what direction the tooth would have pointed from the socket based on those photos alone.
Also, there appears to be a defect on the side of the Jane Doe's #6 tooth that might have been caused by a misaligned #7.
Both the skull image and Cindy's photo are pretty similar in terms of the orientation to the camera (though not exactly similar). I tried overlaying their photos, and they look pretty close within a reasonable tolerance for the slight difference in orientation.
The remaining teeth in the skull very closely align to Cindy's visible teeth in her photo. Her two upper canines (#6 & #11) and her upper right central incisor (#8) look pretty close in the overlay. I couldn't get an exact overlay on the images, but it's close enough that the difference might be attributable to the camera angle difference.
She also has a similarly broad dorsum of the nose with a very slight rightward skew, and a similarly strong chin.
The big negatives are that she doesn't have blonde hair, and she is a bit too young. But aside from that, she looks pretty close.
I'm not entirely sure that these two cases would have been subjected to an automated comparison.
Cindy's DNA profile is submitted and tests complete, according to her NamUs casefile. The Jane Doe's DNA section indicates: "Sample available - Not yet submitted "
However, both the MP and the UP have dental profiles entered, so it would seem that if this was a match, there would have been an dental hit.