What do you think is KR best piece of evidence she has to refute the prosecutions' evidence?
1) No evidence of THC in gummy?
2) No evidence of fentanyl in glass she served him?
3) Something else?
I don't think either of those arguments helps the defense at all, and maybe they even support the prosecution.
Kouri's version of events is that
1 she and Eric were celebrating her closing on a house for her business
2 she made Eric a Moscow Mule in the kitchen, brought it to their bedroom where he drank it in bed, and he also consumed a THC gummy
3 shortly after, she went to put one of her children to bed and fell asleep
4 she woke up around 3:22 a.m. and found Eric Richins deceased at the foot of their bed, and called 911.
The idea that the fentanyl came from gummies laced with THC is a KR attempt to explain how he died from fentanyl. If there's no THC there, it's casts doubt on her claims.
The state, on the other hand, says she put pills in his drink that she admits she made for him.
In addition, the idea that the glass she served him was missing fentanyl is erroneous. When 911 arrived, it was not on the scene, so there's no way to say what it might have had. And the "missing glass" is an issue for her as she was the only one there.
Yet her story was that she left while he was drinking from it, and then came back to find him dead, and frantically called 911 for help while she tried to resuscitate him. The evidence is that once he drank that drink, so strong a dose, he would have been killed almost immediately. So what happened to the glass? Where did it go? How did it walk away (and why)? Those are damning issues for her.