CUCKOOHEAD
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2012
- Messages
- 5,540
- Reaction score
- 12
Attorney: You testified today that on October 24 you went to McDonald's.
Witness: Yes, that's correct.
Attorney: But at the preliminary hearing last year you stated that you went out to dinner.
Witness: We went to McDonald's.
Attorney: But saying you "went out to dinner" doesn't sound like you went to a fast food place.
Witness: Well, we went out to eat.
Attorney: "Going out to dinner" and "going out to eat" don't sound like the same thing.
Witness: I don't know.
Attorney: What did you have to eat?
Witness: I don't remember, it was years ago.
Attorney: You have no idea what you had to eat.
Witness: It was probably a Big Mac.
Attorney: But you don't actually remember.
Witness: No. That's all I ever get at McDonald's, but I don't specifically remember.
Attorney: In fact, you could have gone somewhere else.
Witness: No, we went to McDonald's.
Attorney: Do you have a receipt from McDonald's?
Witness: No, it was five years ago!
Attorney: So you don't save your receipts.
Witness: From McDonald's?! No!
Why would any JUDGE allow this nonsense to go on and on?