BeepBeep1
Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2019
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 63
I can't believe the FBI missed the details the COLD podcast found for the images!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't believe the FBI missed the details the COLD podcast found for the images!
I can't believe the FBI missed the details the COLD podcast found for the images!
COLD also did great work regarding Josh's 3 suspicious car accidents. He got rear ended 3 separate times over the course of a decade, very likely purposefully, in order to get as much insurance money as he possibly could out of it. His last car accident was the August before Susan went missing, where he got rear ended at like 2 MPH, and claimed neck/back pain. He got a prescription for cyclobenzaprine, a muscle relaxer. There were only 6 missing by the time Susan went missing in December, so investigators believe this is what he likely drugged her with.
Also - Dave discovered that Josh had to get an IME (independent medical evaluation) AFTER Susan went missing in order to get insurance money etc, and only then was it discovered that he had a torn rotator cuff. He likely got this from moving Susan's body.
Ugh. God I hate him.
Ellis Maxwell, the lead investigator, felt they had enough to go to trial and get a conviction. It was the State’s Attorney who would not go forward with charges. He kept telling police to get more evidence. LE were very frustrated with him.I still don't get how the police didn't have enough to charge Josh for her disappearance.
She vanished under suspicious circumstances and there were bloodstains in the house. I've seen people charged for less.
I still don't get how the police didn't have enough to charge Josh for her disappearance.
She vanished under suspicious circumstances and there were bloodstains in the house. I've seen people charged for less.
no body cases are really hard to prove in criminal court. the standard for guilt is beyond a resonable doubt, that means if you have any doubt in your mind as a juror you should find the defendant innocent. without a body the prosectors dont know what cause her death (gun shot, stabbing, etc.), when she was killed (they cant definitively place the defendant at the scene or the crime nor do they usually no where the crime even occured), or what the motive was (was it heat of the moment, was it planned). Jurors like a story that makes sense and without this information alot of times only circumstantial evidence can be used to explain what happened. they cant for sure say what happened, when, where, or how. they cant for sure day the defendant was defandent was there or explain what triggered him. It leaves open alot of what ifs. If they take the case to trial without the body and the jury finds him innocent double jeopardy prohibits that person from being tried again. So its a really big risk to take and Susan and her family deserve justice.I still don't get how the police didn't have enough to charge Josh for her disappearance.
She vanished under suspicious circumstances and there were bloodstains in the house. I've seen people charged for less.