wendybtn
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2014
- Messages
- 6,225
- Reaction score
- 5,562
When discussing the b&e, I got the impression that WH forgot where he was for a moment. It was almost like he couldn't believe someone would dare ask him that. Then, after reexamining the quagmire he found himself in, he "confesses" to the b&e. He didn't "crack." The police already had enough to charge him with the b&e and he knew it.
To suggest police accuse everyone all the time is borderline ignorant. In a case like this, police have to start with those closest to AJ. Statistically someone she knows is responsible, most often that means family. WH is a felon who tells tall unverifiable tales and has found evidence on multiple occasions. Police have every reason to grill him. It's their job.
And if he had nothing to do with AJ's disappearance, WH's actions are just as bad in my opinion. He has made this case about him and not about AJ. Not to mention whatever "evidence" he discovered won't do any good in court.
Perhaps "accuse everyone" is not quite the wording ibiz meant to use. I would say more that LE goes into a missing persons case a blank slate and lets the filer start the story; friends, co-workers, family fill in the side stories and some of the paragraphs. They don't accuse everyone but they are open to where the evidence and the story leads them.