LadyL
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2009
- Messages
- 29,148
- Reaction score
- 78,522
how many of those 'statistics' were raised to fight, were born into abuse?
your stats don't specify that
I'm not going to tear you or anyone apart
everyone reading this thread already knows the truth but fear motivates these bans
chihuahuas are by far the most aggressive breed but because they're small, they don't do as much damage
did you want to ban chihuahuas too?
your stats don't specify that
I'm not going to tear you or anyone apart
everyone reading this thread already knows the truth but fear motivates these bans
chihuahuas are by far the most aggressive breed but because they're small, they don't do as much damage
did you want to ban chihuahuas too?
I thought I would get torn apart for my opinion if I posted it here, but it looks like most people here agree with me.
Pit bulls are dangerous. They just are.
https://www.dogsbite.org/dog-bite-statistics-fatalities-2015.php
"34 U.S. dog bite-related fatalities occurred in 2015. Despite being regulated in Military Housing areas and over 700 U.S. cities, pit bulls contributed to 82% (28) of these deaths. Pit bulls make up about 6.6% of the total U.S. dog population."
This is not normal, for a dog to be so violent. Rottweilers are also violent (the 2nd most violent, after pit bulls), statistically, but there are more rottweilers than pit bulls in the US and they still kill less than pit bulls. So while I definitely would not own one, I would trust a rottweiler way more than a pit bull.
Pit bulls were bred to kill. People say "Well, it's all in how you raise them!" This has been shown time and time again to be false. Pit bulls raised by perfectly nice, normal owners snap and kill them in an instant.