Indeed, and why leave an issue ripe for appeal? As an aside, if anyone can enlighten me, I think I may have misinterpreted a DCNewsNow post shared in-thread yesterday. It said:
“ An interpreter has been used all the times Naresh Bhatt appeared in court. The defense said they were ready to proceed without an interpreter but the judge said he needs to be assured Naresh understands the proceedings today.
@DCNewsNow”
I’m not sure if the interpreter wasn’t there because the defendant did not want to avail himself of this service, or, if the translator wasn’t available and the defense offered to proceed for the day, anyway. I know it’s a moot issue because the judge decided it was required but I’m just curious.