soothsayer
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2011
- Messages
- 62
- Reaction score
- 1
That Saieed rape-suspect is probably too young to be our guy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your findings make so much sense. You should submit them to LE or to the Harrington's. In addition, wasn't there a t-shirt located in a nearby apartment complex?I've been VERY much interested in this case ever since reading about it a couple years ago. Recently, with the use of Google Earth, I've been examining the place where here body was found, the distance from JPJ Arena, and also the area of the Fairfax attempted rape. The first thing I started thinking about was the close proximity of colleges to both of the crimes. George Mason University in Fairfax is 4 miles away from the crime scene, and Virginia International University is basically just yards away from the crime. Obviously, JPJ Arena is on the UVA campus. This got me thinking about the possibility that the perp was a student at these times (2005 in Fairfax, and 2009 at UVA).
This belief of mine became deeper while doing more research on all of this. I came across a description of the assailant by the Fairfax victim and it stated he had a zip-up type of sweater and some light pants on (possibly khaki or cargo, etc.). Being a college student back in 2005 myself, I know that wearing nice sweaters (and with zippers) and khakis (possibly cargos) was something I wore all the time during my days at the University of Kentucky. Many other college-aged males wore the same things then as well. Many still do. It's kind of a college, preppy type of wardrobe.
So, thinking about the clothing, really has started to make me convinced that this perp was a college student at possibly George Mason or Virginia International in Fairfax back in 2005. I then began to believe that this perp went on to graduate school (or transfer) at UVA around 2009. I myself went to the University of Kentucky for undergrad and the University of Louisville for graduate school over a period of 7 years.
So again, in conclusion, I think because of the proximity of the crimes to these major schools, as well as his clothing, leads me to believe the perp was a student at the close-by universities at the time of the attacks. He very well could have lived nearby to the attacks (especially the first one) as the Fairfax attack happened at a place close to apartments and townhomes in which some George Mason and Virginia International Univ. students are known to live. He obviously knew where he was taking the victim (back by the pool by the townhomes) after grabbing her and he knew that area. He was also on foot as well in that first attack. Nobody knows how he contacted Morgan at the UVA campus, whether it be on foot or in his car.
Was this guy an undergrad student in Fairfax in 2005 and then a graduate-level student at UVA in 2009? Another possibility is that he could be a professor that worked at both schools during those times? I don't know, but those are my thoughts. If I was the investigators, I would try to get the names of people who lived in apartments or townhouses near the first attack. I would then run those names next to students/professors at George Mason and Virginia Int'l. Univ. in 2005 and at UVA in 2009.
I hear what you're saying about the age SoothSayer, but I don't think that should be a reason to discount this theory. I say that because people who go to college can be of all ages. There are a lot of students in undergraduate and graduate programs that are in their mid to late 20's, as well as early 30's. In addition, a lot of men can look a little older than they actually are. Also, this person doesn't have to be a student and can work for the universities in various different positions. He could be some type of researcher, professor, janitor, coach, doctor, hospital employee, etc.? I just think the location of these crimes screams out that the perp is a guy with relations to the schools nearby.
I also have some thoughts about the location of the body. I have looked at Google Earth and have read many reports on the location. It seems to me that, at first, there was a belief that someone had to know the area to put the body back there. I think it was a mistake to paint this picture as police may have focused too much on the neighbors/area workers, while the public may have began to only believe that the person who killed Morgan had to work or live in that area. As I continued reading (news stories, other members' posts) and scanning the Google Earth images, I have come to the conclusion that anybody could have found that spot if they were just looking for a random secluded area. I understand that if the perp took a certain route to the location that he could have driven a truck or SUV back relatively close to the area. The perp would then have to remove the victim and carry her through some woods, across a creek, and then lay her down. I think the guy could have gone off away from Charlottesville to take Morgan to a secluded area to do whatever. Once he killed her, he probably was just looking for somewhere that was surrounded by woods and that couldn't be seen from houses. He probably just wanted to get rid of the body and so he took a drastic choice of driving by a nearby house (possibly turning off lights) and then just driving way out into a field. He then probably saw some trees and thought, 'I'll take her back behind there.'
So while I think the man could, indeed, have known the area, I also think that he may not have known the area and could have just found it by chance in a desperate search for a drop-off location.
Another thought on Anchorage Farms:
I've read that many students would go to Anchorage Farms to party (I guess like have parties in the fields).
We all know Morgan was quite incapacitated from whatever substances she had taken & possibly that fall in the bathroom. She was acting very strangely that night. If she was hitchiking and got into a car with the perp on/near the bridge where she was last seen, is it possible a very inebriated Morgan got in the car & in the course of talking to the driver/perp (if we assume he didn't immediately attack her), that Morgan suggested they go party at Anchorage Farms? Perp realizes here's a chance to get her willingly to go to a secluded spot. He drives her the ten or so miles there, they go out in the field, a very inebriated Morgan think she's just going to continue partying, and he attacks and kills her. Any way this is possible- that Morgan suggested Anchorage Farms as it was a known rural party spot? (Please note that I am in NO WAY blaming Morgan for what happened there).