I can't, the people on HLN are like family to me :seeya:
So, do you put the same weight in her testimony (11:19:19 on the same Youtube) when she says TM said "Oh, s**t, *****is behind me"?
And at 11:20 she hears TM say "Why are you following me for?"
Heavy breathing man says : "Whats you doing around here?"
And at 11:22, she hears TM say "Get off, get off........."...and phone goes dead...?
Or do you believe only her testimony that TM told her he was "At" his dad's fiance's, but not the other part of her testimony?
Not snark, just wondering what you believe is credible and non-credible in her testimony.
Only A tad? :floorlaugh:
I am like a total addict right now!
Your husband sounds like a sweetheart!
The Rev Jackson just on Fox says " no" when asked if an aquittal would be ok...Judge Jeanene show
I totally agree. Did the Defense ever bring up point- that, clearly, George never got a punch or hit in?No. Because GZ never had the upper hand.. TM was not beaten, cut, His sweatshirt not pulled.. No hits with a flashlight. To me the evidence shows that TM got the upper hand first and fast.
It only goes to TM if he was the one who was under physical attack and that is not what the evidence shows. OMO
DR G on Fox
And it was stunning how much of the state's evidence supported the defense. JMO. OMO. MOO.