gracielee
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 4,095
- Reaction score
- 8
I am guessing 8 NG, 4 G at the end.
My guess is the exact opposite of yours.
I am guessing 8 NG, 4 G at the end.
I'm not that shocked that some of the jurors had reasonable doubt, but I am shocked that this Wake County jury did not return a guilty verdict. They normally do this and that's what has me so surprised. I know it's not a popular opinion on these boards, but I can see how they saw doubt. I don't think he is innocent. I believe he is guilty as charged and a very cruel, pathalogical person, but they are my feelings after following the case. IF I was a juror, I'm not sure I could take that leap to guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, based on the evidence.
I do hope the jurors do open up about how they saw things. It could help the state prepare more and close up any gaps. It could also cause the state to offer a plea deal.
I feel it was the opposite. Eight guilty, four not guilty. See you guys at the retrial. :seeya:
Wonder if MM has heard the news?
Now she may get a second chance at him.
just sayin'
fran
:runaway: :doorhide: hoh: hwow: :shocked2: :nerves: :eye:Ironically and totally coincidentally, the poll I created last week had a closing date/time of TODAY at 4:13pm.
That happens to be the exact moment the jurors walked out of the courtroom after a hung jury.
< cue Twilight Zone music >
Sure hope not.,,,,would be shocked.
The state made many errors and should be able to recover in round 2.
The case was and IS very strong.
She and Pat can party hard tonight![/QUOT
No kidding, otto. She, Pat, and JY are all three quite a group. I feel sorry for LF and MF.
I thought the case was strong too. Guess this jury showed us!
I'm still in shock!
JMHO
fran
PS>....I'm not saying the jury is wrong, just that they may not have understood everything. Sometimes I think that's a disadvantage that we Websleuthers have. We know the case inside out before the trial even begins. Sometimes that can make it difficult for us to understand how the jury could reach or not reach a certain conclusion as evidenced by the verdict. There's things we know not put into evidence, that may have influenced them, and who knows why the pros didn't use it. Or they may have been denied to use it...
No kidding, otto. She, Pat, and JY are all three quite a group. I feel sorry for LF and MF.
I thought the case was strong too. Guess this jury showed us!
I'm still in shock!
JMHO
fran
PS>....I'm not saying the jury is wrong, just that they may not have understood everything. Sometimes I think that's a disadvantage that we Websleuthers have. We know the case inside out before the trial even begins. Sometimes that can make it difficult for us to understand how the jury could reach or not reach a certain conclusion as evidenced by the verdict. There's things we know not put into evidence, that may have influenced them, and who knows why the pros didn't use it. Or they may have been denied to use it...
Can we get Alice Stubbs on the case? (I know she was his custody attorney...) But she depo'd BC for nearly 7 hrs! She knows how to grill someone. Maybe she could teach BH.
I honestly think that if he had not testified we would not have round 2 coming up. I can not help but think there was some real dopes on that jury. I know that is terrible to say, I could see this in the BC trial, even w/the 1/2 *advertiser censored* pro BH who else would do this ? Sorry I am sooo annoyed. JMO