VT VT - Rita Curran, 24, Burlington, 19 July 1971

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Feb 21 2023 rbbm
''BURLINGTON, Vt. —
Burlington Police identified the suspect in the 51-year-old cold case murder of Rita Curran.
Officials identified the suspect as William DeRoos. A cigarette butt left at the scene of the crime led police to DeRoos through third party ancestry DNA.
During a press conference Tuesday, police say DeRoos and his then wife, Michelle, lived in the apartment below Curran's at 15 Brooks Ave.
According to detectives, DeRoos left his apartment after getting into a fight with Michelle to go for a walk. During this time, police say DeRoos strangled and killed Curran.''

''Acting Police Chief Jon Murad said DeRoos, who was then 31, lived upstairs from Curran with his wife at the time of Curran’s murder. Married for only two weeks, DeRoos and his wife had a quarrel on the night of the murder and DeRoos “left for a cool-down walk,” Murad said.

Shortly after the killing, DeRoos’ wife gave police an alibi for her husband
, according to Murad.

“Five decades later, she gave our detectives a different story: the truth,” Murad said.

DeRoos later traveled to Thailand, where he lived for several decades as a Buddhist monk before his death in San Francisco in 1986, at the age of 46, according to Murad.''
They were married for only two weeks and yet she kept his secret for five decades? I'm glad she eventually came forward but had she spoken up after they divorced/separated (or even after he left the country and could not threaten/harm her), justice could have been served in Rita's case.
 
URLINGTON, Vt. – After 52 years, a 1971 Vermont murder has been solved using decades-old DNA evidence.

Rita Curran was violently murdered in her Burlington apartment in 1971, and the case remained a mystery for years. But in a Tuesday press conference, the Burlington Police Department announced that Curran's case was solved – and the man responsible for the 24-year-old's murder, William DeRoos, died years ago.

The case was solved through modern DNA and genealogy technology and the careful preservation of evidence from the crime scene in 1971. The most incriminating evidence: a cigarette butt found next to Curran's body that contained DNA evidence.

Former Sen. Patrick Leahy, who was county prosecutor at the time of the murder, said he saw many gruesome crimes during his time as prosecutor but Rita Curran's family stayed in this thoughts for years after.

"They weren't going to bring Rita Curran back but they could at least bring closure," he said in an interview after the press conference. "And after 50 years, they did."
 
They were married for only two weeks and yet she kept his secret for five decades? I'm glad she eventually came forward but had she spoken up after they divorced/separated (or even after he left the country and could not threaten/harm her), justice could have been served in Rita's case.


"Detective Thomas Chennette, who interviewed DeRoos's first ex-wife, said Tuesday he didn't believe she knew he had killed Curran, but was protecting him because he had a criminal record."

Source: https://www.npr.org/2023/02/22/1158...tests-solve-a-52-year-old-murder-of-vermont-w

I'm guessing he was very violent and threatened the then-wife that if she didn't lie he would be "unfairly" targeted by police due to his criminal record and it would ruin both of their lives. It does beg the question of why she didn't come forward after he moved away but maybe she thought she would get in trouble for lying to police originally.
 
Shortly after Curran’s murder, William DeRoos left his wife and moved to Thailand to become a Buddhist monk. His then-wife ― who Murad said does not face charges for lying to police back in 1971 ― said that she barely saw him again, though authorities said he’s believed to have remained violent.

DeRoos eventually moved back to the U.S., and in 1974 he remarried a second woman in San Francisco, California, who told police that there were two instances where he was violent around her, authorities said.

During one instance, the couple was talking with a female friend when she said he took out a pocket knife and stabbed the woman in her abdomen “for no reason whatsoever.” He was arrested, and the woman was treated for her injuries. Deroos later told his wife that he thought it was her that he stabbed.
 
Shortly after Curran’s murder, William DeRoos left his wife and moved to Thailand to become a Buddhist monk. His then-wife ― who Murad said does not face charges for lying to police back in 1971 ― said that she barely saw him again, though authorities said he’s believed to have remained violent.

DeRoos eventually moved back to the U.S., and in 1974 he remarried a second woman in San Francisco, California, who told police that there were two instances where he was violent around her, authorities said.

During one instance, the couple was talking with a female friend when she said he took out a pocket knife and stabbed the woman in her abdomen “for no reason whatsoever.” He was arrested, and the woman was treated for her injuries. Deroos later told his wife that he thought it was her that he stabbed.
I understand why she may have initially given her husband a false alibi out of fear, but if he fled to Thailand shortly after the murder, why didn't the police take a second look at him? Did they not find it strange that one of Rita's neighbors abruptly packed up and moved halfway across the world after the murder?
 
The WCAX news article has the full supplementary investigation report linked at the bottom. The full read basically explains everything about how LE reached a conclusion to this crime and is very informative: https://webpubcontent.gray.tv/wcax/docs/Rita Curran Murder-Trieb Final Report.pdf
On page 16 it says that police received a tip from an "informer" shortly after the murder who told them that William DeRoos was capable of committing violence. It seems like a pretty big oversight for LE to not have taken a deeper look at the upstairs neighbor who is said to be capable of violence who fled to Thailand shortly after the murders. MOO.
 
On page 16 it says that police received a tip from an "informer" shortly after the murder who told them that William DeRoos was capable of committing violence. It seems like a pretty big oversight for LE to not have taken a deeper look at the upstairs neighbor who is said to be capable of violence who fled to Thailand shortly after the murders. MOO.

It seems really strange.

Did you see in the supplementary report the list of other POIs who LE developed at the time of the murder (who they eventually tested the DNA profile of Unknown#1 against)? I wonder if LE at the time of the murder was overly focused on one of those individuals to the exclusion of other possibilities.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
123
Guests online
2,720
Total visitors
2,843

Forum statistics

Threads
603,392
Messages
18,155,725
Members
231,717
Latest member
Nat Dru
Back
Top