Deceased/Not Found WA - Rachael Anderson, 40, Clarkston, 16 April 2010 - #3 *C. Capone guilty*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
They are pretty old, but some are troubling. IMO

An NCIC criminal history record of Robert Bogden, born June 15, 1966, revealed four arrests in Salt Lake City between 1985 and 1987:

3/15/1985 - Criminal Mischief; convicted; confinement 5 days, fined $75.

5/8/1987 – Vehicle Burglary; no information available.

6/12/1987 – Trespassing; no information available.

11/11/1987 – Assault, Theft, Possession of a controlled substance, Mushrooms; pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance a 3rd degree felony on 2/1/1988; discharged from probation 2/11/1989.

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-...d-a-suspect-in-her-disappearance-he-had-a-gun

Isabelle did a great job on this article. Hope she keeps it up. Also, for the astrologers out there, we have a DOB on him.......
 
I would love to see a chart on him if someone could tell me what it means in english! ;)

Has anyone looked at google earth between the RB address and the Palouse Multiple Services addy. 8.3 miles. With a WIDE variety of places Rachael could be! This will not make it any easier.
 
So I have been going over CC's Criminal record a little closer and on the idaho courts site there is a 2004 charge of....Wildlife-unlawful possession/transportation of...he was found guilty...spent 6 days in jail and paid fines of $271.00.....

I had mentioned him being caught with firearms before....ie hunting.....and I bet this was what they decided to charge hime with...

I could be wrong....but that's my guess
 
I would love to see a chart on him if someone could tell me what it means in english! ;)

Has anyone looked at google earth between the RB address and the Palouse Multiple Services addy. 8.3 miles. With a WIDE variety of places Rachael could be! This will not make it any easier.

Ditto on the chart!

EXACTLY-WIDE variety of routes to get to RB from PMS - (strange initials for a place of business). Some routes would be about 5 miles-if that. LOTS AND LOTS of farm fields and forest in between the two. Not to mention thousands of culverts, drainage ditches, etc. IMO - There must be a reason searches have not been done, or if they have, not publicized 1.) Too vast-miles and miles to cover. We are surrounded by remote wilderness! 2.) People tromping around may disturb the "evidence" and private land owners may not approve of so many people trespassing since crops have just been planted, and, there is a lot of crop dusting by plane taking place. Might be a liability 3.) Worst case scenario-LE has no idea or probable cause, or evidence, to point in any direction-or they might have more than we know.

I just don't get it-ARGHHH!
 
So I have been going over CC's Criminal record a little closer and on the idaho courts site there is a 2004 charge of....Wildlife-unlawful possession/transportation of...he was found guilty...spent 6 days in jail and paid fines of $271.00.....

I had mentioned him being caught with firearms before....ie hunting.....and I bet this was what they decided to charge hime with...

I could be wrong....but that's my guess

I wish there were a way to figure out where he went hunting--I would think the LE might have checked that out with the fish and game. He has to purchase a specific tag for whatever location he intended on hunting. Could be a clue??
 
A couple more interesting facts.....

In the 1997 Burglary charge there was a submission of mental heath records....and a motion requesting a protection order for someone......also a 2005 probation violation in that case but he was still released from probation in 2007

And to me this is VERY interesting......
in 1997 MM requested a divorce from CC......then in Aug of 2008 their was a motion for contempt in that case filed by CC against MM (from what I can tell)....in Jan 2009 another motion for contempt (filed by CC against MM).....in Feb of 2009 the Plaintiff MM gives a plea and written response...in June 2009 (right before or around the time he met RA) the divorce was reopened and MM requests a custody trial...in July 2009 there was a custody trial.....and the final result was this...
11/16/2009 Memorandum Decision and Order on Def Motion for Contempt and Plf Motion to Modify Child Custody and for Informal Custody Trial

At that point RA and CC are married...who knows if it means anything.....I just thought the timing was interesting...
 
I wish there were a way to figure out where he went hunting--I would think the LE might have checked that out with the fish and game. He has to purchase a specific tag for whatever location he intended on hunting. Could be a clue??

It depends on what you are hunting first of all...small game isn't split up into sections like big game...and like you all have found out time and time again in this case....just having an are doesn't really narrow it down at all...you could still be talking hundreds of miles...

But after a quick check (so I hope the info is correct) it looks like due to the fact that there are no background checks to buy hunting licences ( I saw a few states that may be an exception to this general rule)....a convicted felon can buy a hunting license....but with the charge being what it is...I can't tell if he had one or not
 
"There is a lot of crop dusting by plane taking place." - Good point. The area farmers would probably be more than willing to search for Rachael while in the air. They fly low and have great ground visuals. This area is the Palouse, and is just that.... miles and miles of open, rolling Palouse.

If you get up to Moscow Mountain it is forested. That mountain is accessible by car. The Coonhounds and Rachael's clothing should be brought in for a search. It has been my knowledge, from having lived in the area, that the mountain can be an area for dumping, and this is not pretty information, but for dumping things not wanting to be found. Investigative and search work could include canvassing the area by helicopter, crop duster, etc. and sending the dogs into Moscow Mountain as well as the field in Lewiston where her cell phone "supposedly" last pinged.

I understand they called off the dogs initially because of the fertilizer being sprayed. Now is the time to get the Coonhounds on task! They are unbelievable in their ability to sniff and find!

God Bless you Sleuths, and may today be the day Rachael finds her way home safely.
 
It depends on what you are hunting first of all...small game isn't split up into sections like big game...and like you all have found out time and time again in this case....just having an are doesn't really narrow it down at all...you could still be talking hundreds of miles...

But after a quick check (so I hope the info is correct) it looks like due to the fact that there are no background checks to buy hunting licences ( I saw a few states that may be an exception to this general rule)....a convicted felon can buy a hunting license....but with the charge being what it is...I can't tell if he had one or not

I agree the possibilities of where she is unimaginable. He had 2 1/2 days!!!!!!!!!!!!! They are going to have to make him talk. Pity the person in that position.....I don't know how they do it, but it must take the patience of a saint. IMO Not unless he told somebody else and they crack.

I wonder if they bow hunt and not with a gun? Still a weapon.

In cases like this I can't understand if someone did somebody in why in the world do they keep the weapon? I can't wrap my brain around that.
 
11/16/2009 Memorandum Decision and Order on Def Motion for Contempt aA couple more interesting facts.....

In the 1997 Burglary charge there was a submission of mental heath records....and a motion requesting a protection order for someone......also a 2005 probation violation in that case but he was still released from probation in 2007

And to me this is VERY interesting......
in 1997 MM requested a divorce from CC......then in Aug of 2008 their was a motion for contempt in that case filed by CC against MM (from what I can tell)....in Jan 2009 another motion for contempt (filed by CC against MM).....in Feb of 2009 the Plaintiff MM gives a plea and written response...in June 2009 (right before or around the time he met RA) the divorce was reopened and MM requests a custody trial...in July 2009 there was a custody trial.....and the final result was this...
nd Plf Motion to Modify Child Custody and for Informal Custody Trial

At that point RA and CC are married...who knows if it means anything.....I just thought the timing was interesting...

Link to the MM/CC proceedings you are quoting please.
 
Link to the MM/CC proceedings you are quoting please.

It is the Idaho courts website....but as we have found it never links you directly to the case itself...

Here is the link to the idaho courts website..
https://www.idcourts.us/repository/start.do

you then have to click on name search....
enter his name
it is the sixth case heading down.... and after you click on that...the wildlife case is the sixth case down and the divorce is the 10th case down.....just giving directions 'cuz there are lots of cases...
 
I also went back and edited my post Knox....I saw that my cut and past had gone wrong and it was confusing...sorry about that..
 
They are pretty old, but some are troubling. IMO

An NCIC criminal history record of Robert Bogden, born June 15, 1966, revealed four arrests in Salt Lake City between 1985 and 1987:

3/15/1985 - Criminal Mischief; convicted; confinement 5 days, fined $75.

5/8/1987 – Vehicle Burglary; no information available.

6/12/1987 – Trespassing; no information available.

11/11/1987 – Assault, Theft, Possession of a controlled substance, Mushrooms; pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance a 3rd degree felony on 2/1/1988; discharged from probation 2/11/1989.

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-...d-a-suspect-in-her-disappearance-he-had-a-gun

Isabelle did a great job on this article. Hope she keeps it up. Also, for the astrologers out there, we have a DOB on him.......

These are also listed in the affidavit on fb.
 
There are also warrants for failure to appear, two fugitive warrants, a warrant for not paying child support in Arizona.
Capone’s lawyers said some of those were misunderstandings, others don’t prove that he wouldn’t show up to court. Griswold says she doesn’t buy it.
Capone will get to re-argue the case for his release at this next hearing. It’s before a different judge who can choose to overturn it.
http://www.nwcn.com/news/washington...ern-Wash-mom-has-long-rap-sheet-93428164.html

ARE YOU KIDDING ME???????????
 
Candle lit for RA and family today. Sending positive thoughts and prayers to accomplish the goal today.

Candle light vigil was wonderful and so cleansing for her son. I have tried to get him to talk about his feelings and what his thoughts are, but prior to the vigil, he would just say "I'm ok". I was getting concerned that he was maybe holding things in but at the candle light vigil out of all the people that were there, he spoke the most. He said a prayer and said some pretty profound and wise things for a little man of 11 yrs old. He's got such and old soul and is really just the most wonderful, awesomest kid I have ever known. He really loves his mother and I know she loved him very much. We will be getting counseling as the lady with the victims advocate office we have been in touch with just got the go ahead to have the families counseling paid for. It's hard and I crack sometimes because I know that deep down inside, this little boy is very sad and hurt. But most of the time you wouldn't know it since he is so strong and just goes about his day with a smile.
 
I agree the possibilities of where she is unimaginable. He had 2 1/2 days!!!!!!!!!!!!! They are going to have to make him talk. Pity the person in that position.....I don't know how they do it, but it must take the patience of a saint. IMO Not unless he told somebody else and they crack.

I wonder if they bow hunt and not with a gun? Still a weapon.

In cases like this I can't understand if someone did somebody in why in the world do they keep the weapon? I can't wrap my brain around that.

From what my step son told me, he had guns. Not sure if he had bows also, but what's to stop him. He is a felon and that still didn't stop him from obtaining guns. Wonder what he did with those guns?? I can ask my step son if he remembers where they went hunting, but he might not know the details. Just got a call from a detective, so I will make sure that they know of these details.
 
They are pretty old, but some are troubling. IMO

An NCIC criminal history record of Robert Bogden, born June 15, 1966, revealed four arrests in Salt Lake City between 1985 and 1987:

3/15/1985 - Criminal Mischief; convicted; confinement 5 days, fined $75.

5/8/1987 – Vehicle Burglary; no information available.

6/12/1987 – Trespassing; no information available.

11/11/1987 – Assault, Theft, Possession of a controlled substance, Mushrooms; pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance a 3rd degree felony on 2/1/1988; discharged from probation 2/11/1989.

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-...d-a-suspect-in-her-disappearance-he-had-a-gun

Isabelle did a great job on this article. Hope she keeps it up. Also, for the astrologers out there, we have a DOB on him.......

I shall respectfully disagree on troubling. He was 19-21 YO kid back then and no doubt did some partying and made a couple bad decisions -- like got in an argument over who those 'shrooms really belonged to. Nothing but a minor traffic violation since then.

Initials only on this guy, no??

Google his name and you'll find out he is respected local business dude with degrees and such now (was easier a week ago before he was attached to this mess and people started going after him -- most hits now relate to this).

Apparently all grown up although I have nothing much else to go on. Maybe still has soft heart for a guy down on his luck, but he DID wake up and use his brain when he found out CC had a gun and was likely stalking Rachael with said gun. And kicked CC's butt out of his house. I think up until then it was doubtful he knew any more about CC's REAL past than those church members running to his rescue.

I give this guy, and the one who sold the gun to CC, chops for stepping up, and since IMHO neither one of them had any direct connection to, or knowledge of, Rachael's disappearance, I don't see them worth going after, at least until LE has a reason to. and if they have not been charged with anything at this point related to the gun sale, or locking up of said gun, it does not seem likely they will.

Just more poor suckers pulled into CC's dark web of deceit.

MOOOOOOOOOOO of course, and back to work!
 
I shall respectfully disagree on troubling. He was 19-21 YO kid back then and no doubt did some partying and made a couple bad decisions -- like got in an argument over who those 'shrooms really belonged to. Nothing but a minor traffic violation since then.

Initials only on this guy, no??

Google his name and you'll find out he is respected local business dude with degrees and such now (was easier a week ago before he was attached to this mess and people started going after him -- most hits now relate to this).

Apparently all grown up although I have nothing much else to go on. Maybe still has soft heart for a guy down on his luck, but he DID wake up and use his brain when he found out CC had a gun and was likely stalking Rachael with said gun. And kicked CC's butt out of his house. I think up until then it was doubtful he knew any more about CC's REAL past than those church members running to his rescue.

I give this guy, and the one who sold the gun to CC, chops for stepping up, and since IMHO neither one of them had any direct connection to, or knowledge of, Rachael's disappearance, I don't see them worth going after, at least until LE has a reason to. and if they have not been charged with anything at this point related to the gun sale, or locking up of said gun, it does not seem likely they will.

Just more poor suckers pulled into CC's dark web of deceit.

MOOOOOOOOOOO of course, and back to work!

Hollyblue,

I agree with you on doing stupid things in our 20's, for sure! That shouldn't be held against him. From what I read, I was under the impression that the police went to RB, not RB going to the police. From my understanding, the man who sold CC the gun was the one who went to the police. The police then contacted RB. That was his first strike.

Secondly...CC goes to see if RA is seeing someone and he takes a gun. RB does NOTHING?

Thirdly, it does say that he asked CC to leave his house...but it also happened to coincide with him leaving town. Also, at that point he may have realized that he helped CC without "knowing it." (ie, picking him up in Lewiston after CC stashed the Yukon there for example.)

The story about him "holding" the gun for CC seems fishy to me, too. It's not like you can't hurt someone without a gun. In fact, if CC did hurt Rachael...I would be very surprised if it were with a gun.

You MAY be right and he may have felt sorry for CC and gotten sucked in like everyone else. But my intuition is saying that he knows more than he's saying. There are TOO many unanswered questions.

LE is being very quiet about what he said in his interview. Nobody has released what he said he was doing for 2 1/2 days. Nobody has released ANYTHING he has said. In all of the other missing cases out there, it seems like the media either gets ahold of "an alibi" or a story (like the stupid "camping" story that Josh Powell told, for example) or SOMETHING. I hope they are making a rock solid case against him and when it finally breaks, the answers will all be in black and white.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
80
Guests online
176
Total visitors
256

Forum statistics

Threads
608,901
Messages
18,247,487
Members
234,497
Latest member
SolAndroid
Back
Top