What's amazing to me is that ALV, considering how loaded her resume is, would not understand that her behavior on cross would HURT the defense, not help it. It's completely bizarre.
If you have a group of laypeople you are trying to sway to your side, why would you deliberately be combative, passive aggressive and non responsive? She could have done a LOT of damage if she had delivered reasonable yes or no responses.
And what is equally bizarre is that Willmott continued to point out JA's words as evidence even after the jurors' questions! Is the Defense purposely trying to present the weakest case possible in the most incompetent way possible?
:what: