tipper
Former Member
How about Leopold and Loeb?K777angel said:[...]
Secondly, the "threats" of violence in that note made the experts laugh. It was clearly someone writing trying to appear as someone who was tough. Writing what they THOUGHT a tough kidnapper would write. But no one writes long, rambling kidnap for ransom notes like that. The sheer length of the note (letter) was a huge red flag that it was bogus. ("thou doth protest too much Patsy!)
Weren't there 2 hang-up calls that morning?K777angel said:"IF" JonBenet were dead? Huh? She WAS dead! And she was dead when the note was written. The note was written BECAUSE she was dead!
"How do I explain this horrific accident turned deadly???"
There was no extortion.
No money was ever sought. Period. To this day.
Not exactly like a baby. When you wrap a baby the feet are covered.K777angel said:The Ramsey's didn't "point to themselves" on purpose by wiping her down (according to the coroner) - but a case is built on FACTS. And it is a FACT that she was molested, wiped down, panties pulled back up, redressed, laid on a blanket and covered/wrapped up like a baby.
NOT something a dangerous predator pedophile kidnapper who doesn't bother to take the child out of the home person would do. Because they DON't EXIST!
There is only so much ANY criminal or killer can do to cover up their crime.
To ask why they did something that would "point to them" - well it's because THEY DID THE CRIME!! AND COVER-UP! (duh)
[...]
It's possible the killer did feel remorse. Perhaps he hadn't really intended for her to get hurt. Perhaps he'd never killed before and the reality was more than he thought it would be.
How many parents molest their children as part of a cover-up to murder?
I think the note was written ahead of the murder